• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们如何改善急诊科晕厥的管理?

How can we improve management of syncope in the Emergency Department?

作者信息

Probst Marc A, Sun Benjamin C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2014;21(6):643-50. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0074. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2014.0074
PMID:25299508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5110209/
Abstract

Syncope is a common and challenging presenting complaint to the Emergency Department (ED). Despite substantial research efforts, there is still considerable uncertainty about the optimal ED management of syncope. There is continued interest among clinicians and researchers in improving diagnostic algorithms and optimizing resource utilization. In this paper, we discuss 4 strategies to improve the emergency care of syncope patients: (1) Development of accurate and consistent risk-stratification, (2) Increased use of syncope observation protocols, (3) Evaluation of a discharge with ambulatory monitoring pathway, (4) Use of shared decision-making for disposition decisions. Since current risk-stratification tools have fallen short with regard to subsequent validation and implementation into clinical practice, we outline key factors for future risk-stratification research. We propose that observation units have the potential to safely decrease length-of-stay and hospital costs for hemodynamically stable, intermediate risk patients without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. For appropriate patients with a negative ED evaluation, we recommend consideration of direct discharge, with ambulatory monitoring and expedited follow-up, as a means of decreasing costs and reducing iatrogenic harms. Finally, we advocate for the use of shared decision-making regarding the ultimate disposition of select, intermediate risk patients who have not had a serious condition revealed in the ED. If properly implemented, these four strategies could significantly improve the care of ED syncope patients by helping clinicians identify truly high-risk patients, decreasing unnecessary hospitalizations, and increasing patient satisfaction.

摘要

晕厥是急诊科常见且具有挑战性的就诊主诉。尽管进行了大量研究,但对于晕厥在急诊科的最佳管理仍存在相当大的不确定性。临床医生和研究人员一直对改进诊断算法和优化资源利用感兴趣。在本文中,我们讨论了改善晕厥患者急诊护理的4种策略:(1)制定准确且一致的风险分层;(2)增加晕厥观察方案的使用;(3)评估采用动态监测途径出院的情况;(4)在处置决策中采用共同决策。由于目前的风险分层工具在后续验证和应用于临床实践方面存在不足,我们概述了未来风险分层研究的关键因素。我们认为,观察单元有潜力安全地缩短血流动力学稳定的中度风险患者的住院时间并降低医院成本,而不会对临床结果产生不利影响。对于急诊评估为阴性的合适患者,我们建议考虑直接出院,并进行动态监测和加快随访,以此作为降低成本和减少医源性伤害的一种手段。最后,我们主张对于在急诊科未发现严重疾病的特定中度风险患者的最终处置采用共同决策。如果实施得当,这四种策略可通过帮助临床医生识别真正的高危患者、减少不必要的住院以及提高患者满意度,显著改善急诊科晕厥患者的护理。

相似文献

1
How can we improve management of syncope in the Emergency Department?我们如何改善急诊科晕厥的管理?
Cardiol J. 2014;21(6):643-50. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0074. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
2
Syncope: current knowledge, uncertainties and strategies for management optimisation in the emergency department.晕厥:急诊科当前的认知、不确定性及优化管理策略
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Jun;73(3):215-221. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1362146. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
3
Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Guide for Clinicians.急诊科晕厥:临床医生指南。
J Emerg Nurs. 2021 Mar;47(2):342-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
Randomized clinical trial of an emergency department observation syncope protocol versus routine inpatient admission.急诊科观察性晕厥方案与常规住院治疗的随机临床试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.029. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
5
Emergency department management of syncope: need for standardization and improved risk stratification.晕厥的急诊科管理:标准化及改进风险分层的必要性
Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;10(5):619-27. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1237-1. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
Risk stratification of adult emergency department syncope patients to predict short-term serious outcomes after discharge (RiSEDS) study.成人急诊科晕厥患者的风险分层以预测出院后短期严重结局(RiSEDS)研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2014 Mar 14;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-14-8.
7
Implementing a guideline to improve management of syncope in the emergency department.实施一项旨在改善急诊科晕厥管理的指南。
Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):e1413-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3833.
8
National cost savings from observation unit management of syncope.晕厥观察单元管理带来的国家成本节约。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(8):934-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.12720. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
9
Development of practice recommendations based on the Canadian Syncope Risk Score and identification of barriers and facilitators for implementation.基于加拿大晕厥风险评分制定实践建议,并确定实施过程中的障碍和促进因素。
CJEM. 2023 May;25(5):434-444. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00498-y. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
10
Emergency department management of patients with syncope according to the 2018 ESC guidelines: Main innovations and aspect deserving a further improvement.根据 2018 ESC 指南对晕厥患者的急诊科管理:主要创新和有待进一步改进的方面。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;283:119-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Novel Emergency Department Quality Measure to Reduce Very Low-Risk Syncope Hospitalizations.开发一种新的急诊科质量衡量标准,以减少极低风险晕厥的住院治疗。
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;79(6):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.急诊科晕厥的共享决策制定:一项随机对照可行性试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;27(9):853-865. doi: 10.1111/acem.13955. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
Risk Stratification of Older Adults Who Present to the Emergency Department With Syncope: The FAINT Score.老年人因晕厥至急诊科就诊的风险分层:FAINT 评分。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;75(2):147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.08.429. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Clinical Benefit of Hospitalization for Older Adults With Unexplained Syncope: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.老年人不明原因晕厥住院的临床获益:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Syncope in the Emergency Department: the SynDA Tool.开发一种用于急诊科晕厥的患者决策辅助工具:SynDA 工具。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;25(4):425-433. doi: 10.1111/acem.13373. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
6
Deceleration capacity as a risk predictor in patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope: A prospective exploratory pilot study.急诊科晕厥患者中减速能力作为风险预测指标的前瞻性探索性初步研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e8605. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008605.
7
Estimating the Cost of Care for Emergency Department Syncope Patients: Comparison of Three Models.急诊科晕厥患者护理费用估算:三种模型的比较
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):253-257. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31171. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
8
Syncope Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: Another Step Forward.急诊科晕厥风险分层:又向前迈进了一步。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):949-51. doi: 10.1111/acem.13036.
9
Perceived Appropriateness of Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: A Survey Study.急诊科共同决策的感知适宜性:一项调查研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):375-81. doi: 10.1111/acem.12904. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Priorities for emergency department syncope research.急诊科晕厥研究的优先事项。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):649-55.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
2
Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias.对出院的可能患有心律失常的急诊科患者进行动态心脏监测。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;15(2):194-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.11.18973.
3
Risk stratification of adult emergency department syncope patients to predict short-term serious outcomes after discharge (RiSEDS) study.成人急诊科晕厥患者的风险分层以预测出院后短期严重结局(RiSEDS)研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2014 Mar 14;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-14-8.
4
Randomized clinical trial of an emergency department observation syncope protocol versus routine inpatient admission.急诊科观察性晕厥方案与常规住院治疗的随机临床试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.029. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
5
Syncope risk stratification in the ED: directions for future research.急诊科晕厥风险分层:未来研究方向
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 May;20(5):503-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12122.
6
Quality-of-life, health service use, and costs associated with syncope.与晕厥相关的生活质量、卫生服务利用和成本。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jan-Feb;55(4):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.009.
7
Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.通过共同决策改善医疗服务并降低成本。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500.
8
Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research.急诊科晕厥风险分层研究的标准化报告指南。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;19(6):694-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01375.x.
9
The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial.胸痛选择决策辅助工具:一项随机试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):251-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964791. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
10
Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科晕厥临床决策规则的准确性和质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):362-373.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.013.