Suppr超能文献

单切口机器人结肠切除术(SIRC)病例系列:单中心的初步经验。

Single-Incision Robotic Colectomy (SIRC) case series: initial experience at a single center.

作者信息

Juo Yen-Yi, Agarwal Samir, Luka Samuel, Satey Sean, Obias Vincent

机构信息

Department of Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1976-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3896-9. Epub 2014 Oct 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with favorable outcomes when compared to open colectomy. Single-Incision Robotic Colectomy (SIRC) is a novel procedure hypothesized to improve upon conventional three-port laparoscopic colectomy. We hereby present and analyze our institution's initial experience with SIRC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 59 patients who underwent SIRC between May 2010 and September 2013, attempting to identify factors associated with conversion rate and postoperative complication rate.

RESULTS

Our study included 34 males (57.6%) and 25 females (42.4%). The mean age was 60.3 years (range 29-92 years), and the mean BMI was 26.6 kg/m(2) (range 14.9-39.7 kg/m(2)). We identified 31 right hemicolectomies (53.4%), 20 sigmoid colectomies (34.5%), 5 left hemicolectomies (1.7%), 2 low anterior resections (3.5%), and 1 total colectomy (1.7%). The overall median operative time was 188 min with an interquartile range of 79 min. Surgical indications included diverticulitis (n = 23, 39.0%), benign colonic mass (n = 18, 30.5%), colon cancer (n = 16, 27.1%), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 1, 1.7%), and Crohn's disease (n = 1, 1.7%). There were four conversions to open procedure (6.8%), three conversions to multiport robotic procedure (5.1%), and one conversion to single-port laparoscopic procedure (1.7%). Reasons for conversions include difficulty mobilizing the colon and robotic equipment malfunction. Conversions were associated with both higher complication rates (62.5 vs 25.5%, p = 0.035) and longer LOS (7.4 vs 4.0 days, p = 0.0003). Postoperative complications occurred in 16 of the 59 cases (27.1%). Higher BMI was the only significant risk factor for postoperative complications. The overall median LOS was 4 ± 2 days, while the median estimated blood loss was 100 ± 90 ml.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience has shown that SIRC can be a safe and feasible procedure for both benign and malignant disease. Patient selection is the key to improving surgical outcomes in SIRC.

摘要

背景

与开腹结肠切除术相比,腹腔镜结肠切除术已显示出良好的疗效。单切口机器人结肠切除术(SIRC)是一种新型手术,据推测其效果优于传统的三孔腹腔镜结肠切除术。在此,我们展示并分析我们机构开展SIRC的初步经验。

方法

我们对2010年5月至2013年9月期间接受SIRC的59例患者进行了回顾性研究,试图确定与中转率和术后并发症发生率相关的因素。

结果

我们的研究包括34例男性(57.6%)和25例女性(42.4%)。平均年龄为60.3岁(范围29 - 92岁),平均体重指数为26.6 kg/m²(范围14.9 - 39.7 kg/m²)。我们确定了31例右半结肠切除术(53.4%)、20例乙状结肠切除术(34.5%)、5例左半结肠切除术(1.7%)、2例低位前切除术(3.5%)和1例全结肠切除术(1.7%)。总体中位手术时间为188分钟,四分位间距为79分钟。手术适应证包括憩室炎(n = 23,39.0%)、良性结肠肿物(n = 18,30.5%)、结肠癌(n = 16,27.1%)、家族性腺瘤性息肉病(n = 1,1.7%)和克罗恩病(n = 1,1.7%)。有4例中转至开腹手术(6.8%),3例中转至多端口机器人手术(5.1%),1例中转至单端口腹腔镜手术(1.7%)。中转原因包括结肠游离困难和机器人设备故障。中转与更高的并发症发生率(62.5%对25.5%,p = 0.035)和更长的住院时间(7.4天对4.0天,p = 0.0003)相关。59例患者中有16例发生术后并发症(27.1%)。更高的体重指数是术后并发症的唯一显著危险因素。总体中位住院时间为4±2天,而中位估计失血量为100±90毫升。

结论

我们的经验表明,SIRC对于良性和恶性疾病都是一种安全可行的手术。患者选择是改善SIRC手术效果的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验