Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):434-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2454-6. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
Compared with single-incision laparoscopy, multiport laparoscopy is associated with greater risk of postoperative wound pain, infection, incisional hernias, and suboptimal cosmetic outcomes. The feasibility of minimally invasive single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal procedures is well-established, but outcome data remain limited.
Patients with benign diverticular disease, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis admitted to Klinikum Leverkusen, Germany, for colonic resection between July 2009 and March 2011 (n = 224) underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery using the SILS port system. Surgeons had ≥7 years' experience in laparoscopic colon surgery but no SILS experience. Patient demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively. Pain was evaluated by using a visual analog scale (0-10). Data were analyzed by using the SPSS PASW Statistics 18 database.
The majority of patients underwent sigmoid colectomy with high anterior resection (AR) or left hemicolectomy (n = 150) for diverticulitis. Our conversion rate to open surgery was 6.3 %, half in patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy with high AR or left hemicolectomy, 95 % of whom had diverticulitis. Mean operating time was 166 ± 74 (range, 40-441) min in the overall population, with shorter times for single-port transanal tumor resection (SPTTR; 89 ± 51 min; range, 40-153 min) and longer times for proctocolectomy (325 min; range, 110-441 min). Mean hospital stay was approximately 10 days, longer after abdominoperineal rectal resection or proctocolectomy (12-16 days). Most complications occurred following sigmoid colectomy with high AR or left hemicolectomy [19/25 (76 %) of early and 4/5 (80 %) of late complications, respectively]. Pain was <4 on a scale of 0-10 in all cases on postoperative day 1, and typically decreased during the next 2 days.
Our findings support the feasibility and tolerability of colorectal surgery, conducted by experienced laparoscopic surgeons without specific training in use of the SILS port.
与单切口腹腔镜相比,多孔腹腔镜术后切口疼痛、感染、切口疝和美容效果不佳的风险更大。微创单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)在结直肠手术中的可行性已得到充分证实,但结果数据仍然有限。
2009 年 7 月至 2011 年 3 月,德国莱沃库森 Klinikum 医院收治的良性憩室病、克罗恩病或溃疡性结肠炎患者(n=224)接受 SILS 端口系统进行单切口腹腔镜手术。外科医生具有 7 年以上腹腔镜结肠手术经验,但没有 SILS 经验。前瞻性收集患者的人口统计学和临床数据。疼痛采用视觉模拟评分(0-10)进行评估。数据分析采用 SPSS PASW Statistics 18 数据库。
大多数患者接受了乙状结肠切除术+高位直肠前切除术(AR)或左半结肠切除术,用于治疗憩室炎(n=150)。我们转为开放手术的比例为 6.3%,其中一半为乙状结肠切除术+高位直肠前切除术或左半结肠切除术,其中 95%的患者患有憩室炎。全人群的平均手术时间为 166±74(范围,40-441)min,单端口经肛门肿瘤切除术(SPTTR)的时间更短(89±51 min;范围,40-153 min),而直肠结肠切除术的时间更长(325 min;范围,110-441 min)。平均住院时间约为 10 天,直肠肛门切除术或直肠结肠切除术的住院时间较长(12-16 天)。大多数并发症发生在乙状结肠切除术+高位直肠前切除术或左半结肠切除术之后[早期并发症分别为 25 例中的 19 例(76%)和 5 例中的 4 例(80%),晚期并发症分别为 25 例中的 5 例(20%)和 5 例中的 1 例(20%)]。术后第 1 天所有病例疼痛评分均<4(0-10 分),且通常在接下来的 2 天内逐渐减轻。
我们的研究结果支持由经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行结直肠手术的可行性和耐受性,而无需专门培训 SILS 端口的使用。