Rodrigues S P, Horeman T, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen J J, Jansen F W
Department of Gynecology, K6-76, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands,
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1982-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3898-7. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
A study was performed to determine differences in applied interaction force between conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery during suturing in a non-clinical setting.
In a laparoscopic box trainer set-up, experts performed two intracorporeal and two extracorporeal sutures on an artificial skin model. They also performed two instrument-tie knots and two one-hand square knots in a similar conventional training set-up. The force exerted on the artificial tissue (mean force, mean non-zero, maximum, and volume) and the time to complete a task were measured. For analysis purposes, sutures are divided in a needle driving phase (Phase 1) and knot-tying phase (Phase 2).
Phase 1: Force values in laparoscopic suturing are significantly higher than in conventional suturing, except for the force volume during extracorporeal suturing versus the one-hand square knot. Phase 2: The mean force non-zero and maximum force during the intracorporeal knot are significantly higher than during the instrument-tie knot. The mean and maximum force during the extracorporeal knot are significantly higher than during the one-hand square knot. Furthermore, laparoscopic suturing takes longer time than conventional suturing.
Expert surgeons apply significantly higher force during laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional surgery even though the same strategy is used. Aspects such as the limited visual and haptic feedback, and movement possibilities hamper surgeons' ability to assess the applied interaction force. Therefore it can be useful to provide additional force feedback about the applied interaction force during training in non-clinical settings.
进行了一项研究,以确定在非临床环境下缝合过程中传统开放手术与腹腔镜手术所施加的相互作用力的差异。
在腹腔镜箱式训练器设置中,专家们在人工皮肤模型上进行了两次体内缝合和两次体外缝合。他们还在类似的传统训练设置中进行了两次器械打结和两次单手方结打结。测量了施加在人工组织上的力(平均力、平均非零力、最大力和力的总量)以及完成一项任务所需的时间。为了分析目的,将缝合分为进针阶段(阶段1)和打结阶段(阶段2)。
阶段1:腹腔镜缝合中的力值显著高于传统缝合,体外缝合与单手方结打结时的力总量除外。阶段2:体内打结时的平均非零力和最大力显著高于器械打结时。体外打结时的平均力和最大力显著高于单手方结打结时。此外,腹腔镜缝合比传统缝合花费的时间更长。
即使采用相同的策略,专家外科医生在腹腔镜手术中施加的力也显著高于传统手术。诸如视觉和触觉反馈有限以及操作可能性等因素会妨碍外科医生评估所施加的相互作用力的能力。因此,在非临床环境下的训练中提供有关所施加的相互作用力的额外力反馈可能会有所帮助。