[Which choice would the radiation oncologist consider if facing an advanced stage laryngeal cancer?].

PURPOSE

To analyse the therapeutic decision considered by radiation oncologists put in a position of being diagnosed with an advanced stage cancer of the larynx accessible either to a total laryngectomy or to an organ preservation protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective analysis based on an anonymous survey filled by 104 radiation oncologists.

RESULTS

A total of 30.7% of radiation oncologists surveyed did not consider any trade in their cure rate to preserve their larynx. The median percentage of cure that they were willing to trade was 10% (2-100%); and 0.9% of them were willing to trade 100% of their chance for cure in order to "avoid" total laryngectomy. A total of 16.3% of radiation oncologists would like to receive more information before making their decision. The additional information most frequently requested concerned the precise stage of the tumour and the potential remedial treatment in case of failure of the laryngeal preservation protocol. None of the analysed demographic variables influenced the choice to trade or not survival chance to preserve the larynx, the percentage of chance that radiation oncologists would consider exchanging, and/or the wish to receive additional information.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study highlights that larynx preservation protocol is not the main therapeutic goal shared by all radiation oncologists put in a position of being diagnosed with an advanced stage cancer of the larynx. Total laryngectomy should remain a treatment option that as organ preservation protocols to be proposed and discussed.