Barclay Linda, McDonald Rachael, Lentin Primrose
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Mar;38(1):1-19. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000085.
Evaluation of rehabilitation outcomes following acquired disability should include participation in social and community life. Evidence is needed to guide clinical practice to ensure that it is client-centered; therefore, findings from studies that report on social and community participation following spinal cord injury (SCI) need to be reviewed and synthesized. The objectives of this critical literature review are to examine the available evidence on social and community participation following SCI and to examine the factors that influence that participation. The barriers and facilitators will be identified and described in terms of the contextual factors - personal or environmental, as outlined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. An additional objective is to appraise the quality of the evidence examined. A systematic literature search was completed in the databases OVID MEDLINE, AMED, CINAHL PLUS, PSYCHINFO, and hand searches were carried out. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were included. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 17 quantitative, five qualitative, and one mixed methods. In general, studies were of low methodological quality, and no intervention studies were identified. The terms participation, social participation, and community participation were used interchangeably often without clarification of meaning. Adequate personal care assistance, appropriate social support, having adequate specialized equipment, and appropriate occupational therapy input were found to facilitate social and community participation, whereas problems with transport, inaccessibility of the natural and built environment, issues with healthcare services and rehabilitation providers, and pain were identified as barriers. In-depth investigation into what aspects of social and community participation are important to those living with SCI is needed so that client-focused solutions and interventions can be identified and developed, aimed at creating and promoting opportunities for social and community participation.
对后天性残疾后的康复结果进行评估应包括参与社会和社区生活。需要证据来指导临床实践,以确保以患者为中心;因此,需要对报告脊髓损伤(SCI)后社会和社区参与情况的研究结果进行回顾和综合分析。这篇批判性文献综述的目的是审视关于SCI后社会和社区参与的现有证据,并研究影响这种参与的因素。将根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》概述的背景因素——个人或环境因素,来识别和描述障碍与促进因素。另一个目标是评估所审视证据的质量。在OVID MEDLINE、AMED、CINAHL PLUS、PSYCHINFO等数据库中完成了系统的文献检索,并进行了手工检索。纳入了定量、定性和混合方法研究。23项研究符合纳入标准:17项定量研究、5项定性研究和1项混合方法研究。总体而言,研究的方法学质量较低且未识别出干预性研究。“参与”“社会参与”和“社区参与”这些术语经常互换使用,且往往未对含义进行明确界定。研究发现,充足的个人护理协助、适当的社会支持、拥有足够的专业设备以及适当的职业治疗投入有助于社会和社区参与,而交通问题、自然和建筑环境的无障碍性问题、医疗服务和康复提供者的问题以及疼痛被确定为障碍。需要深入调查社会和社区参与的哪些方面对脊髓损伤患者至关重要,以便能够确定和开发以患者为中心的解决方案和干预措施,旨在创造和促进社会和社区参与的机会。