Dunlap E D, Matlib M A, Millard R W
Department of Pharmacology and Cell Biophysics, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio.
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Nov 7;64(17):84I-91I; discussion 91I-93I. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90965-x.
The effects of amlodipine (0.3 mg/kg administered intravenously, n = 5) and placebo (n = 5) on recovery of myocardial function and respiration of isolated mitochondria were examined in "stunned" myocardium of normotensive pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Measures of myocardial wall motion, using sonomicrometers, and tissue blood flow, by radioactive microspheres, were obtained at baseline, 15 minutes after administration of amlodipine or placebo, after 10 minutes of left circumflex artery ligation and at 60 minutes of reperfusion. Mean aortic pressure decreased from 115 +/- 6 to 101 +/- 5 mm Hg after administration of amlodipine and remained decreased throughout the experiment. Heart rate was not significantly affected at any time. Both groups showed similar degrees of ischemia: elevation of ST segment to 4.7 +/- 1.4 vs 6.2 +/- 1.9 mV; reduction of ischemic zone shortening fraction to 0.6 +/- 1.9 vs -3.4 +/- 2.7%; and reduction of epicardial and endocardial blood flows (epicardial = 40 +/- 13 vs 43 +/- 13 ml/100 g/min; endocardial = 7 +/- 4 vs 13 +/- 6 ml/100 g/min [values for amlodipine vs placebo]). Mitochondrial state 3 rate of respiration and respiratory control index indicative of rate of adenosine triphosphate synthesis and membrane integrity in myocardial samples taken after 10 minutes of ischemia were significantly reduced in the placebo but not in the amlodipine group. Myocardial function showed significantly greater improvement in amlodipine vs placebo at 60 minutes of reperfusion as indicated by shortening fraction (17.7 +/- -1.4 vs 5.8 +/- -3.5%, amlodipine vs placebo), which may have been related to increased myocardial blood flow and decreased blood pressure during reperfusion. Thus, amlodipine pretreatment prevented mitochondrial dysfunction during ischemia and accelerated recovery of both myocardial mechanical function and blood flow when compared with placebo.
在正常血压的戊巴比妥麻醉犬的“顿抑”心肌中,研究了氨氯地平(静脉注射0.3mg/kg,n = 5)和安慰剂(n = 5)对离体线粒体心肌功能恢复和呼吸的影响。在基线、给予氨氯地平或安慰剂后15分钟、左旋冠状动脉结扎10分钟后以及再灌注60分钟时,使用超声微测仪测量心肌壁运动,并通过放射性微球测量组织血流。给予氨氯地平后,平均主动脉压从115±6降至101±5mmHg,并在整个实验过程中持续降低。心率在任何时候均未受到显著影响。两组显示出相似程度的缺血:ST段抬高至4.7±1.4mV与6.2±1.9mV;缺血区缩短分数降低至0.6±1.9%与-3.4±2.7%;以及心外膜和心内膜血流减少(心外膜=40±13与43±13ml/100g/min;心内膜=7±4与13±6ml/100g/min[氨氯地平与安慰剂的值])。缺血10分钟后采集的心肌样本中,安慰剂组中指示三磷酸腺苷合成速率和膜完整性的线粒体呼吸状态3速率和呼吸控制指数显著降低,而氨氯地平组未降低。再灌注60分钟时,氨氯地平组心肌功能的改善明显大于安慰剂组,缩短分数表明(氨氯地平组与安慰剂组分别为17.7±-1.4%与5.8±-3.5%),这可能与再灌注期间心肌血流增加和血压降低有关。因此,与安慰剂相比,氨氯地平预处理可预防缺血期间的线粒体功能障碍,并加速心肌机械功能和血流的恢复。