Suppr超能文献

普通可变免疫缺陷病诊断标准的比较

Comparison of diagnostic criteria for common variable immunodeficiency disorder.

作者信息

Ameratunga Rohan, Brewerton Maia, Slade Charlotte, Jordan Anthony, Gillis David, Steele Richard, Koopmans Wikke, Woon See-Tarn

机构信息

Department of Virology and Immunology, Auckland Hospital , Auckland , New Zealand ; Department of Clinical Immunology, Auckland Hospital , Auckland , New Zealand.

Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Melbourne Hospital , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2014 Sep 15;5:415. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00415. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVIDs) are the most frequent symptomatic primary immune deficiency condition in adults. The genetic basis for the condition is not known and no single clinical feature or laboratory test can establish the diagnosis; it has been a diagnosis of exclusion. In areas of uncertainty, diagnostic criteria can provide valuable clinical information. Here, we compare the revised European society of immune deficiencies (ESID) registry (2014) criteria with the diagnostic criteria of Ameratunga et al. (2013) and the original ESID/pan American group for immune deficiency (ESID/PAGID 1999) criteria. The ESID/PAGID (1999) criteria either require absent isohemagglutinins or impaired vaccine responses to establish the diagnosis in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia. Although commonly encountered, infective and autoimmune sequelae of CVID were not part of the original ESID/PAGID (1999) criteria. Also excluded were a series of characteristic laboratory and histological abnormalities, which are useful when making the diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria of Ameratunga et al. (2013) for CVID are based on these markers. The revised ESID registry (2014) criteria for CVID require the presence of symptoms as well as laboratory abnormalities to establish the diagnosis. Once validated, criteria for CVID will improve diagnostic precision and will result in more equitable and judicious use of intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy.

摘要

常见变异型免疫缺陷病(CVIDs)是成人中最常见的有症状的原发性免疫缺陷病。该病的遗传基础尚不清楚,没有单一的临床特征或实验室检查能够确诊;它一直是一种排除性诊断。在存在不确定性的领域,诊断标准可提供有价值的临床信息。在此,我们将修订后的欧洲免疫缺陷学会(ESID)登记处(2014年)标准与阿梅拉图加等人(2013年)的诊断标准以及最初的ESID/泛美免疫缺陷小组(ESID/PAGID 1999年)标准进行比较。ESID/PAGID(1999年)标准要求原发性低丙种球蛋白血症患者缺乏同种血凝素或疫苗反应受损才能确诊。虽然CVID的感染性和自身免疫性后遗症很常见,但它们并非最初的ESID/PAGID(1999年)标准的一部分。一系列特征性的实验室和组织学异常也被排除在外,而这些异常在诊断时是有用的。阿梅拉图加等人(2013年)的CVID诊断标准就是基于这些指标。修订后的ESID登记处(2014年)CVID标准要求既有症状又有实验室异常才能确诊。一旦得到验证,CVID标准将提高诊断的准确性,并将导致更公平、明智地使用静脉或皮下免疫球蛋白治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/946f/4164032/d1438256655f/fimmu-05-00415-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验