Guerard Sandra, Barou Jean-Luc, Petit Julien, Poisson Philippe
Arts et Métiers ParisTech.
Dent Mater J. 2014;33(6):799-804. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-044. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
This study examined whether the thermo-modeling process suits the thermal properties of the material constituting mouth-formed mouthguards (MGs). Five mouth-formed MGs were compared: four commercially available MGs (SDI™, Gel Nano™, Opro Shield Gold™, and Kipsta R300™) and one prototype. Differential scanning calorimetry was used to determine melting (T(m)) and crystallization (T(c)) temperatures and specific fusion and crystallization enthalpies (∆H(f) and ∆H(c) (J/g)). MGs were modeled with recording of vestibular flange and occlusal cushion temperatures (Toccl). Tm ranged from 45.3°C to 53.0°C and Tc ranged from 40.9°C to 48.2°C. Specific heat of fusion ranged from 40.2 J/g to 62.0 J/g. Toccl was higher than Tm for all MGs except Kipsta R300™. Guidelines provided by manufacturers may not be adapted to thermal properties of the MG material. To ensure proper thermomodeling, heating and biting durations should be adjusted.
本研究考察了热成型工艺是否适合构成口腔定制护齿器(MGs)的材料的热性能。比较了五种口腔定制MGs:四种市售MGs(SDI™、Gel Nano™、Opro Shield Gold™和Kipsta R300™)以及一种原型产品。采用差示扫描量热法测定熔点(T(m))和结晶温度(T(c))以及比熔化焓和比结晶焓(∆H(f)和∆H(c)(J/g))。对MGs进行建模并记录前庭翼缘和咬合垫温度(Toccl)。熔点范围为45.3°C至53.0°C,结晶温度范围为40.9°C至48.2°C。比熔化热范围为40.2 J/g至62.0 J/g。除Kipsta R300™外,所有MGs的Toccl均高于熔点。制造商提供的指南可能不适用于MG材料的热性能。为确保热成型合适,应调整加热和咬合时间。