Piechowiak H
Offentl Gesundheitswes. 1989 Oct;51(10):599-603.
There are only few scientific publications in literature on medical expertising in social medicine. Although this deficit may be explained by several facts, it cannot be justified. Evaluation is a systematic set of data collection and analysis activities undertaken to place social practice on a more rational basis, i.e. greater efficiency and justice. These aims also hold good for social medicine. Evaluation, however, is only the first step within a broader research programme for quality control and quality improvement efforts, which can be successfully performed only in cooperation with the social insurance institutions. Within their medical services these institutions should provide the organisational prerequisites to enable qualified scientific research in practical social medicine.
关于社会医学中医学鉴定的科学文献非常少。尽管这一不足可以用几个事实来解释，但它是不合理的。评估是为了使社会实践建立在更合理的基础上，即更高的效率和公正性而进行的一系列系统的数据收集和分析活动。这些目标对社会医学同样适用。然而，评估只是更广泛的质量控制和质量改进研究计划中的第一步，只有与社会保险机构合作才能成功实施。在其医疗服务中，这些机构应提供组织前提条件，以便能够在实际社会医学中开展有资质的科学研究。
