Suppr超能文献

探索“测试偏差”的各种解释。

Exploring the various interpretations of "test bias".

作者信息

Warne Russell T, Yoon Myeongsun, Price Chris J

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, Utah Valley University.

Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University.

出版信息

Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2014 Oct;20(4):570-582. doi: 10.1037/a0036503.

Abstract

Test bias is a hotly debated topic in society, especially as it relates to diverse groups of examinees who often score low on standardized tests. However, the phrase "test bias" has a multitude of interpretations that many people are not aware of. In this article, we explain five different meanings of "test bias" and summarize the empirical and theoretical evidence related to each interpretation. The five meanings are as follows: (a) mean group differences, (b) differential predictive validity, (c) differential item functioning, (d) differing factor structures of tests, and (e) unequal consequences of test use for various groups. We explain in this article why meanings (a) and (e) are not actual forms of test bias and that there are serious concerns about (b). In our conclusion, we discuss the benefits of standardized testing for diverse examinees and urge readers to be careful and precise in their use of the phrase "test bias."

摘要

考试偏差是社会上一个备受争议的话题,尤其是当它涉及到在标准化考试中得分往往较低的不同考生群体时。然而,“考试偏差”这个短语有多种解释,很多人并不知晓。在本文中,我们解释了“考试偏差”的五种不同含义,并总结了与每种解释相关的实证和理论证据。这五种含义如下:(a)群体平均差异;(b)差异预测效度;(c)项目功能差异;(d)考试的不同因素结构;(e)考试对不同群体使用产生的不平等后果。我们在本文中解释了为什么含义(a)和(e)不是考试偏差的实际形式,以及对含义(b)存在严重担忧。在结论部分,我们讨论了标准化考试对不同考生的益处,并敦促读者在使用“考试偏差”这个短语时要谨慎和准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验