Shaw Richard J, Benzeval Michaela, Popham Frank
Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e110362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110362. eCollection 2014.
Nordic countries do not have the smallest health inequalities despite egalitarian social policies. A possible explanation for this is that drivers of class differences in health such as financial strain and labour force status remain socially patterned in Nordic countries.
Our analyses used data for working age (25-59) men (n = 48,249) and women (n = 52,654) for 20 countries from five rounds (2002-2010) of the European Social Survey. The outcome was self-rated health in 5 categories. Stratified by gender we used fixed effects linear regression models and marginal standardisation to instigate how countries varied in the degree to which class inequalities were attenuated by financial strain and labour force status.
Before adjustment, Nordic countries had large inequalities in self-rated health relative to other European countries. For example the regression coefficient for the difference in health between working class and professional men living in Norway was 0.34 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.42), while the comparable figure for Spain was 0.15 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.22). Adjusting for financial strain and labour force status led to attenuation of health inequalities in all countries. However, unlike some countries such as Spain, where after adjustment the regression coefficient for working class men was only 0.02 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.10), health inequalities persisted after adjustment for Nordic countries. For Norway the adjusted coefficient was 0.17 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.25). Results for women and men were similar. However, in comparison to men, class inequalities tended to be stronger for women and more persistent after adjustment.
Adjusting for financial security and labour force status attenuates a high proportion of health inequalities in some counties, particularly Southern European countries, but attenuation in Nordic countries was modest and did not improve their relative position.
尽管北欧国家实行平等主义社会政策,但它们并非健康不平等程度最小的国家。对此的一种可能解释是,健康方面的阶级差异驱动因素,如经济压力和劳动力状况,在北欧国家仍呈现出社会模式化。
我们的分析使用了来自欧洲社会调查五轮(2002 - 2010年)中20个国家的工作年龄(25 - 59岁)男性(n = 48,249)和女性(n = 52,654)的数据。结果是分为5类的自评健康状况。按性别分层,我们使用固定效应线性回归模型和边际标准化来研究各国在经济压力和劳动力状况对阶级不平等的缓解程度方面的差异。
在进行调整之前,相对于其他欧洲国家,北欧国家在自评健康方面存在较大的不平等。例如,生活在挪威的工人阶级男性和专业男性之间健康差异的回归系数为0.34(95%置信区间0.26至0.42),而西班牙的可比数字为0.15(95%置信区间0.08至0.22)。对经济压力和劳动力状况进行调整后,所有国家的健康不平等都有所缓解。然而,与西班牙等一些国家不同,在西班牙,调整后工人阶级男性的回归系数仅为0.02(95%置信区间 - 0.05至0.10),而北欧国家在调整后健康不平等仍然存在。对于挪威,调整后的系数为0.17(95%置信区间0.10至0.25)。男性和女性的结果相似。然而,与男性相比,女性的阶级不平等往往更强,且在调整后更持久。
对经济保障和劳动力状况进行调整可缓解一些国家(特别是南欧国家)很大一部分的健康不平等,但北欧国家的缓解程度较小,且并未改善它们的相对地位。