Department of Geography, Wolfson Research Institute, Queen's Campus, Durham University, Stockton on Tees, TS17 6BH, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Sep;65(9):740-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2011.136333. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
Welfare states are important determinants of health. Comparative social epidemiology has almost invariably concluded that population health is enhanced by the relatively generous and universal welfare provision of the Scandinavian countries. However, most international studies of socioeconomic inequalities in health have thrown up something of a public health 'puzzle' as the Scandinavian welfare states do not, as would generally be expected, have the smallest health inequalities. This essay outlines and interrogates this puzzle by drawing upon existing theories of health inequalities--artefact, selection, cultural--behavioural, materialist, psychosocial and life course--to generate some theoretical insights. It discusses the limits of these theories in respect to cross-national research; it questions the focus and normative paradigm underpinning contemporary comparative health inequalities research; and it considers the future of comparative social epidemiology.
福利国家是健康的重要决定因素。比较社会流行病学几乎一致认为,斯堪的纳维亚国家相对慷慨和普遍的福利供给会增进人口健康。然而,大多数关于健康的社会经济不平等的国际研究都提出了一个公共卫生“谜题”,因为斯堪的纳维亚福利国家的健康不平等并不像人们通常预期的那样小。本文通过借鉴现有的健康不平等理论——人工制品、选择、文化——行为、物质主义、心理社会和生命历程——来产生一些理论见解,概述并探讨了这一谜题。本文讨论了这些理论在跨国研究方面的局限性;质疑了当代比较健康不平等研究的重点和规范范式;并考虑了比较社会流行病学的未来。