Tworoger Shelley S, Rice Megan S, Rosner Bernard A, Feeney Yvonne B, Clevenger Charles V, Hankinson Susan E
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):73-80. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0896. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
Prolactin is a lactogenic hormone associated with breast cancer risk in prospective studies, which used immunoassays. The immunoassay captures multiple isoforms and may not fully reflect the biologic activity of prolactin relevant to breast carcinogenesis.
We considered plasma bioactive prolactin levels measured by the Nb2 lymphoma cell bioassay, which is sensitive to the somatolactogenic activity of prolactin and growth hormone, within a nested case-control study of invasive breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS/NHSII). We also considered associations with breast cancer risk factors.
We had bioassay measures on 1,329 cases and 1,329 controls. Bioassay levels were inversely associated with parity (4+ vs. 0 children = -18%, P = 0.01), body mass index (30+ vs. <22 kg/m(2) = -16%, P < 0.01), and age at menopause (53+ vs. 48 years = -18%, P = 0.03) and positively with family history of breast cancer (yes vs. no = 14%, P < 0.01). The relative risk (RR) comparing the top versus bottom quartile of bioassay levels was 1.19 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.94-1.51; Ptrend = 0.18]. The association was suggestively stronger for postmenopausal (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 0.93-1.98; Ptrend = 0.12) versus premenopausal women (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71-1.37; Ptrend = 0.71). There was an association for cases diagnosed <4 years after blood draw (RR = 2.66; 95% CI, 1.45-4.89; Ptrend < 0.01), but not for cases diagnosed later. We did not observe differential associations by estrogen receptor status or other tumor characteristics.
Our results show similar associations for prolactin levels measured by bioassay and by immunoassay with both breast cancer risk factors and risk.
Future work examining risk prediction model of breast cancer can use the immunoassay to accurately characterize risk.
在前瞻性研究中,催乳素是一种与乳腺癌风险相关的促乳激素,这些研究使用了免疫测定法。免疫测定法可检测多种同工型,可能无法完全反映与乳腺癌发生相关的催乳素的生物活性。
在护士健康研究(NHS/NHSII)中针对浸润性乳腺癌的巢式病例对照研究中,我们考虑了通过Nb2淋巴瘤细胞生物测定法测量的血浆生物活性催乳素水平,该方法对催乳素和生长激素的促生长活性敏感。我们还考虑了与乳腺癌风险因素的关联。
我们对1329例病例和1329例对照进行了生物测定。生物测定水平与产次(4胎及以上与0胎相比=-18%,P=0.01)、体重指数(30及以上与<22kg/m²相比=-16%,P<0.01)、绝经年龄(53岁及以上与48岁相比=-18%,P=0.03)呈负相关,与乳腺癌家族史呈正相关(有与无相比=14%,P<0.01)。生物测定水平最高四分位数与最低四分位数相比的相对风险(RR)为1.19[95%置信区间(CI),0.94-1.51;P趋势=0.18]。绝经后女性(RR=1.36;95%CI,0.93-1.98;P趋势=0.12)与绝经前女性(RR=0.99;95%CI,0.71-1.37;P趋势=0.71)相比,这种关联提示更强。采血后<4年确诊的病例存在关联(RR=2.66;95%CI,1.4