Suppr超能文献

仅通过经阴道超声测量子宫深度与经腹部超声引导下试移植测量的准确性一样吗?

Is uterine depth measurement by trans-vaginal ultrasound alone as accurate as measurement carried out by trans-abdominal ultrasound-guided trial transfer?

作者信息

Edris Fawaz E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Tel. +966 (12) 5270000. Fax. +966 (12) 5270001. E-mail.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2014 Oct;35(10):1231-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability of trans-vaginal-scan (TVS) in measuring the uterine depth (UD) in comparison with ultrasound-guided trial-transfer (UTT).

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in 66 consecutive patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The study took place in a private IVF center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between November 2013 and January 2014. The patients underwent UD measurements using TVS and UTT, sequentially. All scans were performed by a single sonographer, and all UTT were carried out by a single physician who was blinded to the TVS measurement.

RESULTS

The median (95% confidence interval) UD measurement using the TVS method was 6.9 cm (5.0-12.5) and UTT was 7.1 cm (5.9-13.5), (p<0.0001). Fifteen patients (22.7%) had a difference of >1 cm between the 2 measurement modalities (group-B). When measured by UTT, 93.3% of patients in group-B had UD >/-8cm, compared with 9.8% of patients in group-A, (p<0.0001). Group-B had a significantly longer uterine cavity when measured by UTT (p<0.0001), and a trend towards significance when measured by TVS (p=0.055). The TVS measurements generally underestimated UD when compared with UTT.

CONCLUSION

Trans-vaginal-scan is less reliable than UTT and should not be used as a substitute. Larger sample-size studies involving different personnel, and equipment is needed.

摘要

目的

评估经阴道超声扫描(TVS)测量子宫深度(UD)与超声引导下试移植(UTT)相比的可靠性。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了66例连续接受体外受精和胚胎移植(IVF-ET)的患者。该研究于2013年11月至2014年1月在沙特阿拉伯吉达的一家私立IVF中心进行。患者依次接受TVS和UTT测量UD。所有扫描均由一名超声检查医师进行,所有UTT均由一名对TVS测量结果不知情的医师进行。

结果

使用TVS方法测量的UD中位数(95%置信区间)为6.9厘米(5.0 - 12.5),UTT测量的为7.1厘米(5.9 - 13.5),(p<0.0001)。15例患者(22.7%)在两种测量方式之间的差异>1厘米(B组)。通过UTT测量时,B组93.3%的患者UD>/-8厘米,而A组为9.8%,(p<0.0001)。通过UTT测量时,B组子宫腔明显更长(p<0.0001),通过TVS测量时有显著趋势(p = 0.055)。与UTT相比,TVS测量通常低估了UD。

结论

经阴道超声扫描比UTT可靠性更低,不应作为替代方法使用。需要开展涉及不同人员和设备的更大样本量研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13aa/4362120/5e16cae7b35d/SaudiMedJ-35-1231-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验