• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用标准差标准的更好的常模参照评分。

A better norm-referenced grading using the standard deviation criterion.

作者信息

Chan Wing-shing

机构信息

a Office of Educational Services, Faculty of Medicine , The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shatin , Hong Kong.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(4):364-5. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.945031.

DOI:10.1080/10401334.2014.945031
PMID:25318031
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The commonly used norm-referenced grading assigns grades to rank-ordered students in fixed percentiles. It has the disadvantage of ignoring the actual distance of scores among students.

PURPOSES

A simple norm-referenced grading via standard deviation is suggested for routine educational grading.

METHODS

The number of standard deviation of a student's score from the class mean was used as the common yardstick to measure achievement level. Cumulative probability of a normal distribution was referenced to help decide the amount of students included within a grade. RESULTS of the foremost 12 students from a medical examination were used for illustrating this grading method.

RESULTS

Grading by standard deviation seemed to produce better cutoffs in allocating an appropriate grade to students more according to their differential achievements and had less chance in creating arbitrary cutoffs in between two similarly scored students than grading by fixed percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Grading by standard deviation has more advantages and is more flexible than grading by fixed percentile for norm-referenced grading.

摘要

背景

常用的常模参照评分法按照固定百分位数对排名的学生进行评分。其缺点是忽略了学生之间分数的实际差距。

目的

建议采用一种通过标准差进行的简单常模参照评分法用于常规教育评分。

方法

用学生成绩与班级平均分的标准差数量作为衡量成绩水平的通用标准。参考正态分布的累积概率来帮助确定一个等级内包含的学生数量。以一次医学考试中前12名学生的成绩为例来说明这种评分方法。

结果

与固定百分位数评分相比,标准差评分似乎能更好地根据学生的差异成绩为他们分配合适的等级,并且在两个成绩相近的学生之间产生任意划分界限的可能性更小。

结论

对于常模参照评分,标准差评分比固定百分位数评分更具优势且更灵活。

相似文献

1
A better norm-referenced grading using the standard deviation criterion.一种使用标准差标准的更好的常模参照评分。
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(4):364-5. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.945031.
2
A standard setting method with the best performing students as point of reference: practical and affordable.以表现最佳的学生为参照点的标准化设置方法:实用且经济实惠。
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):154-60. doi: 10.3109/01421590903196979.
3
A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.使用概化理论比较两种高风险临床绩效评估中的标准设定方法。
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1077-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825cea4b.
4
What is ... normative versus criterion-referenced assessment.什么是……常模参照评估与标准参照评估。
Med Teach. 1989;11(2):145-50. doi: 10.3109/01421598909146317.
5
A plea for the proper use of criterion-referenced tests in medical assessment.呼吁正确使用医学评估中的准则参照测验。
Med Educ. 2009 Dec;43(12):1141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03541.x.
6
Standard setting of script concordance tests using an adapted Nedelsky approach.采用改编后的 Nedelsky 方法进行脚本一致性测试的标准化设置。
Med Teach. 2013 Apr;35(4):314-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.746446. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
7
Development of a modified Cohen method of standard setting.建立改良 Cohen 标准设定法。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):e678-82. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611192.
8
Is it appropriate to use core clerkship grades in the selection of residents?在住院医师选拔中使用核心临床实习成绩是否合适?
Curr Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;63(6):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.012.
9
Assessing a method to limit influence of standardized tests on clerkship grades.评估一种限制标准化考试对实习成绩影响的方法。
Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(4):287-91. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.715256.
10
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.多项选择题考试中的标准设定与维持:医学教育与培训学会指南第37号
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity Evidence for the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信的有效性证据。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Aug;13(4):490-499. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01110.1. Epub 2021 Aug 13.