• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受同期器械植入的患者中经上腔静脉进行房室交界区消融的长期随访:单中心经验

Long-term follow-up in AV junction ablation via the SVC in patients undergoing concurrent device implantation: a single center experience.

作者信息

Issa Ziad F, Amr Bashar S, Laham Hytham

机构信息

Southern Illinois University, Department of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois; Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, Springfield, Illinois.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;38(2):254-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12525. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/pace.12525
PMID:25318466
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ablation of the atrioventricular junction (AVJ) combined with pacemaker implantation (the "ablate and pace" approach) has been an effective treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) when rate control is the goal of therapy and when rapid ventricular rates during AF is refractory to pharmacologic therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This report describes the feasibility and safety of catheter ablation of AVJ via a superior vena cava (SVC) approach performed during concurrent pacemaker or defibrillator implantation.

METHODS

A total of 170 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF underwent combined AVJ ablation and pacemaker or defibrillator implantation using the axillary or subclavian venous approach. The acute and long-term success of achieving complete atrioventricular (AV) block, the impact of the ablation procedure on the total procedure time and fluoroscopy duration, and procedural complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A dual-chamber device in 61% of patients and biventricular device in 39% patients. Catheter ablation of the AVJ was acutely successful in 166 patients (97.6%). The mean procedure time of the AVJ ablation was 7.0 ± 3.3 minutes and the mean fluoroscopy time during the ablation procedure was 3.1 ± 3.2 minutes. The average duration of RF energy application required to achieve complete AV block was 129 ± 65 seconds. Procedural complications were observed in seven patients. Complete AV block persisted in 96% of patients during a mean follow-up of 26 ± 16 months.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation of the AVJ can be performed successfully and safely using the SVC approach in patients undergoing concurrent device implantation, and it may offer several advantages over the conventional femoral approach.

摘要

背景

当治疗目标是控制心率且房颤(AF)时快速心室率对药物治疗无效时,房室结(AVJ)消融联合起搏器植入(“消融并起搏”方法)一直是房颤患者的有效治疗策略。

目的

本报告描述了在同时植入起搏器或除颤器期间,经上腔静脉(SVC)途径进行AVJ导管消融的可行性和安全性。

方法

共有170例药物难治性房颤患者采用腋静脉或锁骨下静脉途径,接受了AVJ消融联合起搏器或除颤器植入。评估了实现完全房室(AV)阻滞的急性和长期成功率、消融过程对总手术时间和透视时间的影响以及手术并发症。

结果

61%的患者植入双腔装置,39%的患者植入双心室装置。166例患者(97.6%)AVJ导管消融急性成功。AVJ消融的平均手术时间为7.0±3.3分钟,消融过程中的平均透视时间为3.1±3.2分钟。实现完全AV阻滞所需的射频能量平均应用持续时间为129±65秒。7例患者出现手术并发症。在平均26±16个月的随访期间,96%的患者持续存在完全AV阻滞。

结论

在同时进行装置植入的患者中,使用SVC途径可以成功且安全地进行AVJ导管消融,与传统的股静脉途径相比,它可能具有几个优点。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up in AV junction ablation via the SVC in patients undergoing concurrent device implantation: a single center experience.在接受同期器械植入的患者中经上腔静脉进行房室交界区消融的长期随访:单中心经验
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;38(2):254-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12525. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
2
An approach to ablate and pace:AV junction ablation and pacemaker implantation performed concurrently from the same venous access site.一种消融与起搏的方法:经同一静脉入路同时进行房室结消融和起搏器植入。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Sep;30(9):1116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00822.x.
3
Comparison of different approaches to atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;37(12):1686-93. doi: 10.1111/pace.12481. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
Leadless pacemaker implantation and concurrent atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者的无导线起搏器植入及同期房室结消融
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May;41(5):504-510. doi: 10.1111/pace.13312. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation patients vs. patients in sinus rhythm: the role of atrioventricular junction ablation.心脏再同步治疗在心房颤动患者与窦性心律患者中的获益:房室交界区消融的作用
Europace. 2008 Jul;10(7):809-15. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun135. Epub 2008 May 28.
6
Atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker therapy in patients with drug-resistant atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Fontan operation.Fontan手术后耐药性房性快速心律失常患者的房室交界区消融与起搏器治疗
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;16(1):24-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.03272.x.
7
Long-term outcome of the atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation for symptomatic refractory atrial fibrillation.症状性难治性心房颤动的房室结消融术和起搏器植入术的长期疗效
Europace. 2008 Apr;10(4):412-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun020. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
8
Long-term survival after ablation of the atrioventricular node and implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者房室结消融及永久性起搏器植入后的长期生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 5;344(14):1043-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441403.
9
Atrio-ventricular junction ablation and pacemaker treatment: a comparison between men and women.房室交界区消融与起搏器治疗:男性与女性的比较
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2018 Jun;52(3):120-126. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2018.1446549. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Long-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy are worse in patients who require atrioventricular junction ablation for atrial fibrillation than in those with sinus rhythm.对于因心房颤动而需要进行房室结消融的患者,心脏再同步治疗的长期效果比窦性心律患者更差。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(3):309-15. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0110. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Snaring a newly placed His-bundle lead to prevent dislodgement after superiorly performed atrioventricular node ablation.在进行房室结消融术后,圈套新放置的希氏束电极以防止其移位。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021 Dec 29;8(4):301-302. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2021.12.012. eCollection 2022 Apr.