Colton Katharine, Yang S, Hu P F, Chen H H, Bonds B, Stansbury L G, Scalea T M, Stein D M
Shock Trauma Anesthesia Research Organized Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine and R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
Shock Trauma Anesthesia Research Organized Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine and R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;31(4):263-9. doi: 10.1177/0885066614555692. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
Past work has shown the importance of the "pressure times time dose" (PTD) of intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure [ICP] > 19 mm Hg) in predicting outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. We used automated data collection to measure the effect of common medications on the duration and dose of intracranial hypertension.
Patients >17 years old, admitted and requiring ICP monitoring between 2008 and 2010 at a single, large urban tertiary care facility, were retrospectively enrolled. Timing and dose of ICP-directed therapy were recorded from paper and electronic medical records. The ICP data were collected automatically at 6-second intervals and averaged over 5 minutes. The percentage of time of intracranial hypertension (PTI) and PTD (mm Hg h) were calculated.
A total of 98 patients with 664 treatment instances were identified. Baseline PTD ranged from 27 (before administration of propofol and fentanyl) to 150 mm Hg h (before mannitol). A "small" dose of hypertonic saline (HTS; ≤250 mL 3%) reduced PTD by 38% in the first hour and 37% in the second hour and reduced the time with ICP >19 by 38% and 39% after 1 and 2 hours, respectively. A "large" dose of HTS reduced PTD by 40% in the first hour and 63% in the second (PTI reduction of 36% and 50%, respectively). An increased dose of propofol or fentanyl infusion failed to decrease PTD but reduced PTI between 14% (propofol alone) and 30% (combined increase in propofol and fentanyl, after 2 hours). Barbiturates failed to decrease PTD but decreased PTI by 30% up to 2 hours after administration. All reductions reported are significantly changed from baseline, P < .05.
Baseline PTD values before drug administration reflects varied patient criticality, with much higher values seen before the use of mannitol or barbiturates. Treatment with HTS reduced PTD and PTI burden significantly more than escalation of sedation or pain management, and this effect remained significant at 2 hours after administration.
过去的研究表明,颅内高压(颅内压[ICP]>19mmHg)的“压力×时间剂量”(PTD)在预测重度创伤性脑损伤后的预后方面具有重要意义。我们使用自动数据收集来测量常用药物对颅内高压持续时间和剂量的影响。
回顾性纳入2008年至2010年期间在一家大型城市三级医疗中心住院并需要进行ICP监测的17岁以上患者。从纸质和电子病历中记录ICP导向治疗的时间和剂量。ICP数据以6秒的间隔自动收集,并在5分钟内进行平均。计算颅内高压时间百分比(PTI)和PTD(mmHg·h)。
共识别出98例患者的664个治疗实例。基线PTD范围从27(在给予丙泊酚和芬太尼之前)到150mmHg·h(在给予甘露醇之前)。“小”剂量的高渗盐水(HTS;≤250mL 3%)在第1小时使PTD降低38%,在第2小时降低37%,并在1小时和2小时后分别使ICP>19的时间降低38%和39%。“大”剂量的HTS在第1小时使PTD降低40%,在第2小时降低63%(PTI分别降低36%和50%)。增加丙泊酚或芬太尼输注剂量未能降低PTD,但在2小时后使PTI降低14%(单独使用丙泊酚)至30%(丙泊酚和芬太尼联合增加)。巴比妥类药物未能降低PTD,但在给药后2小时内使PTI降低30%。所有报告的降低均与基线有显著变化,P<.05。
给药前的基线PTD值反映了患者不同的危急程度,在使用甘露醇或巴比妥类药物之前的值要高得多。与增加镇静或疼痛管理相比,HTS治疗显著降低了PTD和PTI负担,且在给药后2小时这种效果仍然显著。