Garcell Humberto Guanche, Hernandez Tania M Fernandez, Abdo Elmusbasher Abu Baker, Arias Ariadna Villanueva
The Cuban Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Dukhan, Qatar.
Department of Public Health, Supreme Council of Health, Doha, Qatar.
Qatar Med J. 2014 Jun 16;2014(1):50-6. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2014.9. eCollection 2014.
Public health surveillance systems should be evaluated periodically, and should involve an assessment of system attributes.
Evaluate hospital-based surveillance of communicable diseases using the elements of timeliness and data quality.
Descriptive study was conducted of communicable diseases reported at The Cuban Hospital, Qatar during January 2012 to December 2013. The completeness of notifications were assessed for contact number, address, place of work, and date of symptom onset. Time between the symptoms onset and physician notification, time between physician and Supreme Council of Health notification and time between physician notification and lab confirmation were calculated for each case.
Percentage of cases with documented essential information and 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined. Mean and standard deviation (SD) of time were calculated.
1065 patients were reported, 75% were male, 80% non-qataries and 91.5% were group 1 (high priority) diseases. Symptom onset date was documented in 91.5% (95% CI, 89.8; 93.2) of cases; contact number in 84.7% (82.5;86.8), with lower frequencies for address (68.1%, 65.3;70.9) and place of work (60.5%, 57.5;63.4). Diagnostic time for tuberculosis was 61.7 days (SD 93.0), acute hepatitis 18.5 days (SD 17.6), typhoid fever 17.0 days (SD 11.6 days), other diseases of sexual transmission 300.2 days, chronic hepatitis 165 days and AIDS 154.5 days. The time of notification to the Supreme Council of Health for group 1 diseases was 1.2 days (SD 1.4).
Our results show that the quality of essential data and timeliness is not sufficient to meet the needs of the health system. Additional studies should focus on the evaluation of time delay for diagnosis of high priority diseases.
公共卫生监测系统应定期进行评估,且应包括对系统属性的评估。
利用及时性和数据质量要素评估基于医院的传染病监测。
对2012年1月至2013年12月期间卡塔尔古巴医院报告的传染病进行描述性研究。评估通知中联系人电话、地址、工作地点和症状出现日期的完整性。计算每个病例从症状出现到医生报告的时间、从医生报告到最高卫生委员会报告的时间以及从医生报告到实验室确认的时间。
确定记录了基本信息的病例百分比及95%置信区间(CI)。计算时间的均值和标准差(SD)。
报告了1065例患者,75%为男性,80%非卡塔尔人,91.5%为第1组(高优先级)疾病。91.5%(95%CI,89.8;93.2)的病例记录了症状出现日期;84.7%(82.5;86.8)记录了联系人电话,地址(68.1%,65.3;70.9)和工作地点(60.5%,57.5;63.4)的记录频率较低。结核病的诊断时间为61.7天(SD 93.0),急性肝炎为18.5天(SD 17.6),伤寒热为17.0天(SD 11.6天),其他性传播疾病为300.2天,慢性肝炎为165天,艾滋病为154.5天。第1组疾病向最高卫生委员会报告的时间为1.2天(SD 1.4)。
我们的结果表明,基本数据的质量和及时性不足以满足卫生系统的需求。进一步的研究应侧重于评估高优先级疾病的诊断时间延迟。