Personality and Assessment, Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 30;5:1075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01075. eCollection 2014.
Class clowns traditionally were studied as a type concept and identified via sociometric procedures. In the present study a variable-centered approach was favored and class clown behaviors were studied in the context of character strengths, orientations to happiness and satisfaction with life. A sample of 672 Swiss children and adolescents filled in an 18 item self-report instrument depicting class clown behaviors. A hierarchical model of class clown behaviors was developed distinguishing a general factor and the four positively correlated dimensions of "identified as a class clown," "comic talent," "disruptive rule-breaker," and "subversive joker." Analysis of the general factor showed that class clowns were primarily male, and tended to be seen as class clowns by the teacher. Analyses of the 24 character strengths of the VIA-Youth (Park and Peterson, 2006) showed that class clowns were high in humor and leadership, and low in strengths like prudence, self-regulation, modesty, honesty, fairness, perseverance, and love of learning. An inspection of signature strengths revealed that 75% of class clowns had humor as a signature strength. Furthermore, class clown behaviors were generally shown by students indulging in a life of pleasure, but low life of engagement. The four dimensions yielded different character strengths profiles. While all dimensions of class clowns behaviors were low in temperance strengths, the factors "identified as the class clown" and "comic talent" were correlated with leadership strengths and the two negative factors ("disruptive rule-breaker," "subversive joker") were low in other directed strengths. The disruptive rule breaking class clown was additionally low in intellectual strengths. While humor predicted life satisfaction, class clowning tended to go along with diminished satisfaction with life. It is concluded that different types of class clowns need to be kept apart and need different attention by teachers.
传统上,小丑角色是通过社会计量程序作为一种类型概念进行研究的。在本研究中,采用了变量中心的方法,并将小丑角色行为置于性格优势、幸福感取向和生活满意度的背景下进行研究。瑞士的 672 名儿童和青少年填写了一份描绘小丑角色行为的 18 项自我报告问卷。建立了一个小丑角色行为的层次模型,区分了一个一般因素和四个正相关的维度,分别是“被认定为小丑”“喜剧天赋”“破坏规则的破坏者”和“颠覆性的小丑”。对一般因素的分析表明,小丑角色主要是男性,并且往往被老师视为小丑角色。对 VIA-Youth(Park 和 Peterson,2006)的 24 种性格优势的分析表明,小丑角色在幽默和领导力方面得分较高,而在谨慎、自我调节、谦虚、诚实、公平、毅力和热爱学习等方面得分较低。对签名优势的检查表明,75%的小丑角色拥有幽默作为签名优势。此外,热衷于享乐但投入度较低的学生往往会表现出小丑角色行为。这四个维度产生了不同的性格优势特征。虽然小丑角色行为的所有维度都缺乏节制力,但“被认定为小丑”和“喜剧天赋”这两个因素与领导力优势相关,而另外两个消极因素“破坏规则的破坏者”和“颠覆性的小丑”在其他定向优势方面得分较低。破坏规则的破坏者在智力优势方面也较低。虽然幽默能预测生活满意度,但小丑角色往往会降低对生活的满意度。结论是,不同类型的小丑角色需要分开对待,教师也需要给予不同的关注。