Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 15;20(24):6336-45. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1293. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications.
From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.
Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.
MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.
本研究旨在评估不同癌症中 MET 扩增的情况、与临床因素和遗传异常的关联,以及对靶向治疗反应的影响。
从 2010 年 5 月至 2012 年 11 月,对在 MD 安德森 I 期临床诊所就诊的晚期肿瘤患者的样本进行了 FISH 检测,以分析 MET 基因扩增情况。根据 MET 扩增状态,比较了患者的人口统计学、组织学特征、分子特征和 I 期方案的结果。
在 1115 名患者中,有 29 名(2.6%)存在 MET 扩增。在肾上腺(13 例中有 2 例,15%)和肾(28 例中有 4 例,14%)肿瘤中,MET 扩增的发生率最高,其次是胃食管(6%)、乳腺(5%)和卵巢癌(4%)。MET 扩增与腺癌(P=0.007)、高级别肿瘤(P=0.003)、更多转移部位、更高的 BRAF 突变和 PTEN 缺失有关(均 P<0.05)。有和无 MET 扩增的患者的中位总生存期分别为 7.23 个月和 8.62 个月(HR=1.12;95%置信区间,0.83-1.85;P=0.29)。在 20 名接受 I 期方案治疗的 MET 扩增患者中,有 4 名(20%)患者对靶向血管生成的药物有部分缓解(6 例中有 3 例,50%)。没有患者接受 c-MET 抑制剂治疗(7 例均无)有客观缓解。
在 2.6%的实体瘤患者中检测到 MET 扩增,与腺癌、高级别组织学和更高的转移负荷有关。其他通路(BRAF 突变和 PTEN 缺失)的伴随改变以及靶向治疗(包括 c-MET 抑制剂)的不同反应表明,需要进一步研究以针对这一人群。