Lo Sharon L, Vroman Lisa N, Durbin C Emily
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):280-90. doi: 10.1037/pas0000033. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
The structure, stability, and validity of child temperament traits have primarily been examined with parent questionnaire methods, but laboratory methods represent an important complement. However, the novel setting and contrived scenarios of laboratory methods and their low convergence with parent questionnaire methods have led some to question their ecological validity. We tested this assumption by employing parents as sources of information regarding the ecological validity of laboratory assessments of child temperament. Parents observed their child participating in 10 different laboratory tasks and reported on the typicality of their child's behavior. The results suggested parents considered their child's responses during the laboratory tasks as highly typical representations of their child's behavior outside of the lab, supporting the ecological validity of trait-relevant behavior elicited with laboratory tasks.
儿童气质特征的结构、稳定性和有效性主要通过家长问卷法进行考察,但实验室方法是重要的补充。然而,实验室方法新颖的环境和人为设定的情景,以及它们与家长问卷法的低一致性,导致一些人质疑其生态效度。我们通过将家长作为儿童气质实验室评估生态效度的信息来源来检验这一假设。家长观察孩子参与10项不同的实验室任务,并报告孩子行为的典型性。结果表明,家长认为孩子在实验室任务中的反应是其在实验室外行为的高度典型表现,支持了实验室任务引发的与特质相关行为的生态效度。