• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对轻至中度原发性高血压患者的多中心、安慰剂对照、比较200毫克和400毫克塞利洛尔的研究。

A multi-centre, placebo controlled comparative study between 200 mg and 400 mg celiprolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

作者信息

Trafford J A, Latta D, Little P S, Parsley J, Ankier S I, Quail D

机构信息

Renal Unit, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1989;11(9):550-6. doi: 10.1185/03007998909112671.

DOI:10.1185/03007998909112671
PMID:2533057
Abstract

A two-centre, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized 3-way crossover study was undertaken to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of celiprolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week single-blind placebo run-in/screening period, during which no antihypertensive medication was given, was followed by 3 consecutive 4-week treatment periods with placebo or celiprolol (200 mg or 400 mg daily). At the end of the 4-week placebo run-in/screening period, 26 hospital out-patients with a seated mean blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) of 161.4/101.7 mmHg and a mean pulse rate of 75 beats/min entered the double-blind crossover phase of the study. Results showed that there was no significant difference in seated mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure between 200 mg celiprolol daily (149.2/92.3 mmHg) and 400 mg celiprolol daily (149.1/92.5 mmHg). However, mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly (p less than 0.05) lower on celiprolol than on placebo (157.1/98.2 mmHg). Neither dose of celiprolol had a significant effect on seated pulse rate. No patient was withdrawn due to an adverse event and no laboratory assessment outside the normal range was reported to be of any clinical significance. It is concluded that oral celiprolol, 200 mg or 400 mg daily, is effective and well tolerated for controlling mild to moderate essential hypertension. Since both doses had very similar effects on blood pressure there is no advantage in this group of patients for the 400 mg daily dose of celiprolol.

摘要

一项双中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机三向交叉研究旨在评估塞利洛尔治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的疗效、耐受性和安全性。在为期4周的单盲安慰剂导入/筛查期内,未给予抗高血压药物,随后是连续3个为期4周的治疗期,分别使用安慰剂或塞利洛尔(每日200毫克或400毫克)。在4周安慰剂导入/筛查期结束时,26名门诊患者进入了该研究的双盲交叉阶段,这些患者坐位平均血压(收缩压/舒张压)为161.4/101.7毫米汞柱,平均脉搏率为每分钟75次。结果显示,每日服用200毫克塞利洛尔(149.2/92.3毫米汞柱)和每日服用400毫克塞利洛尔(149.1/92.5毫米汞柱)时,坐位平均收缩压或舒张压无显著差异。然而,服用塞利洛尔时的坐位平均收缩压和舒张压显著低于安慰剂组(157.1/98.2毫米汞柱)(p<0.05)。两种剂量的塞利洛尔对坐位脉搏率均无显著影响。没有患者因不良事件退出研究,也没有报告超出正常范围的实验室评估具有任何临床意义。结论是,每日口服200毫克或400毫克塞利洛尔对控制轻至中度原发性高血压有效且耐受性良好。由于两种剂量对血压的影响非常相似,对于该组患者,每日400毫克塞利洛尔并无优势。

相似文献

1
A multi-centre, placebo controlled comparative study between 200 mg and 400 mg celiprolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.一项针对轻至中度原发性高血压患者的多中心、安慰剂对照、比较200毫克和400毫克塞利洛尔的研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1989;11(9):550-6. doi: 10.1185/03007998909112671.
2
Celiprolol in systemic hypertension.塞利洛尔治疗系统性高血压
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 1;63(12):839-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90053-2.
3
A placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter study of celiprolol in the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension.塞利洛尔治疗轻、中度高血压的安慰剂对照双盲多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8 Suppl 4:S119-21. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198608004-00027.
4
24-h ambulatory non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of the antihypertensive action of celiprolol.24小时动态无创血压监测在评估塞利洛尔降压作用中的应用
J Int Med Res. 1988;16 Suppl 1:52A-61A.
5
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine besilate compared with candesartan cilexetil monotherapy and amlodipine besilate monotherapy in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.评价坎地沙坦西酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平联合治疗与坎地沙坦西酯单药治疗和苯磺酸氨氯地平单药治疗轻中度原发性高血压日本患者的疗效和耐受性:一项多中心、12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 Apr;34(4):838-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
Bronchoneutral effects in hypertensive asthmatics--celiprolol versus chlorthalidone.高血压哮喘患者的支气管中性效应——塞利洛尔与氯噻酮的比较
J Int Med Res. 1988;16 Suppl 1:23A-26A.
7
Daytime-selective antihypertensive activity of celiprolol.
Angiology. 1999 Oct;50(10):797-803. doi: 10.1177/000331979905001003.
8
A randomized double-blind study of atenolol and celiprolol in mild to moderate hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8 Suppl 4:S122-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198608004-00028.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol monotherapy by baseline systolic blood pressure: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.根据基线收缩压评估比索洛尔单药治疗的疗效和耐受性:两项多中心、12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、剂量范围研究的汇总数据的回顾性分析,这些研究纳入了轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.028.
10
Celiprolol in the treatment of hypertension: a comparison with propranolol.塞利洛尔治疗高血压:与普萘洛尔的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8 Suppl 4:S127-31. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198608004-00029.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of partial agonist beta blocker monotherapy for primary hypertension.部分激动剂β受体阻滞剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD007450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2.
2
A predictive model of the health benefits and cost effectiveness of celiprolol and atenolol in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients.塞利洛尔和阿替洛尔在高血压患者心血管疾病一级预防中的健康效益及成本效益预测模型
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Sep;12(3):384-408. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712030-00010.
3
Celiprolol. An evaluation of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.
塞利洛尔:对其治疗高血压和心绞痛的药理特性及临床疗效的评估
Drugs Aging. 1995 Nov;7(5):394-411. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199507050-00006.
4
Celiprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular disease.塞利洛尔:对其药效学、药代动力学特性及在心血管疾病中治疗效果的最新综述。
Drugs. 1991 Jun;41(6):941-69. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199141060-00009.
5
Efficacy of celiprolol in hypertension and angina pectoris. Introduction.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1991 Jan;4 Suppl 6:1195-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00114218.