Bunting E A, Provost J, Konofagou E E
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 21;59(22):6841-58. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/6841. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
Ultrasonic strain imaging has been applied to echocardiography and carries great potential to be used as a tool in the clinical setting. Two-dimensional (2D) strain estimation may be useful when studying the heart due to the complex, 3D deformation of the cardiac tissue. Increasing the framerate used for motion estimation, i.e. motion estimation rate (MER), has been shown to improve the precision of the strain estimation, although maintaining the spatial resolution necessary to view the entire heart structure in a single heartbeat remains challenging at high MERs. Two previously developed methods, the temporally unequispaced acquisition sequence (TUAS) and the diverging beam sequence (DBS), have been used in the past to successfully estimate in vivo axial strain at high MERs without compromising spatial resolution. In this study, a stochastic assessment of 2D strain estimation precision is performed in vivo for both sequences at varying MERs (65, 272, 544, 815 Hz for TUAS; 250, 500, 1000, 2000 Hz for DBS). 2D incremental strains were estimated during left ventricular contraction in five healthy volunteers using a normalized cross-correlation function and a least-squares strain estimator. Both sequences were shown capable of estimating 2D incremental strains in vivo. The conditional expected value of the elastographic signal-to-noise ratio (E(SNRe|ε)) was used to compare strain estimation precision of both sequences at multiple MERs over a wide range of clinical strain values. The results here indicate that axial strain estimation precision is much more dependent on MER than lateral strain estimation, while lateral estimation is more affected by strain magnitude. MER should be increased at least above 544 Hz to avoid suboptimal axial strain estimation. Radial and circumferential strain estimations were influenced by the axial and lateral strain in different ways. Furthermore, the TUAS and DBS were found to be of comparable precision at similar MERs.
超声应变成像已应用于超声心动图,具有作为临床工具的巨大潜力。由于心脏组织复杂的三维变形,二维(2D)应变估计在研究心脏时可能有用。提高用于运动估计的帧率,即运动估计率(MER),已被证明可提高应变估计的精度,尽管在高MER下保持在单次心跳中观察整个心脏结构所需的空间分辨率仍然具有挑战性。过去曾使用两种先前开发的方法,即时间非等距采集序列(TUAS)和发散束序列(DBS),在不影响空间分辨率的情况下成功地在高MER下估计体内轴向应变。在本研究中,在不同的MER(TUAS为65、272、544、815 Hz;DBS为250、500、1000、2000 Hz)下,对这两种序列在体内进行二维应变估计精度的随机评估。使用归一化互相关函数和最小二乘应变估计器,在五名健康志愿者的左心室收缩期间估计二维增量应变。结果表明,两种序列都能够在体内估计二维增量应变。弹性成像信噪比(E(SNRe|ε))的条件期望值用于比较两种序列在多个MER下在广泛临床应变值范围内的应变估计精度。这里的结果表明,轴向应变估计精度比横向应变估计更依赖于MER,而横向估计受应变大小的影响更大。MER应至少提高到544 Hz以上,以避免轴向应变估计不理想。径向和周向应变估计以不同方式受到轴向和横向应变的影响。此外,发现TUAS和DBS在相似的MER下具有相当的精度。