Suppr超能文献

技术说明:用于皮肤活力评估的PrestoBlue和LDH释放检测法与MTT检测法的比较

Technical note: comparison of the PrestoBlue and LDH release assays with the MTT assay for skin viability assessment.

作者信息

Gaucher Sonia, Jarraya Mohamed

机构信息

Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France,

出版信息

Cell Tissue Bank. 2015 Sep;16(3):325-9. doi: 10.1007/s10561-014-9478-1. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

Abstract

MTT assay is the gold standard for assessing skin sample viability but it is time-consuming. Here we compared the MTT test with two other assays for the assessment of skin viability. The MTT, PrestoBlue (colorimetric method) and LDH release assays were applied to fresh and cryopreserved skin. Skin viability was considered proportional to the optical density values of the relevant analytes. PrestoBlue did not reliably distinguish between fresh and cryopreserved skin. The LDH release assay did not allow us to establish a viability index. We recommend the MTT assay for assessing skin viability.

摘要

MTT 法是评估皮肤样本活力的金标准,但它耗时较长。在此,我们将 MTT 试验与另外两种评估皮肤活力的试验进行了比较。MTT 法、PrestoBlue(比色法)和 LDH 释放试验被应用于新鲜和冷冻保存的皮肤。皮肤活力被认为与相关分析物的光密度值成正比。PrestoBlue 不能可靠地区分新鲜皮肤和冷冻保存的皮肤。LDH 释放试验无法让我们建立一个活力指数。我们推荐使用 MTT 法来评估皮肤活力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验