Greene R W, Haas H L, Gerber U, McCarley R W
Harvard Medical School.
EXS. 1989;57:123-37. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9138-7_13.
In vivo microinjections of cholinergic compounds into the medial pontine reticular formation have produced some or depending on the injection site, all of the phenomena of REM, thus providing the only adequate pharmacological model of this behavioral state. The necessary anatomical substrate, a cholinergic projection to the mPRF was recently demonstrated, however the direct effect of cholinergic agonists on mPRF neurons is unknown. We have examined the effects of carbachol on mPRF neurons recorded in vitro from brainstem slices of Sprague-Dawley rats (8-10 days old). Three kinds of response to the application of carbachol (0.5-1 microM) were observed (n = 15) as follows: a depolarizing response (67%), a hyperpolarizing response (20%) and a biphasic response consisting of a hyperpolarizing response followed by a depolarizing response (13%). Under voltage clamp control, the depolarizing response was observed as an inward current resulting from a decrease in conductance which was constant over the membrane potential range of -100 to -50 mV. Reversal potential was negative to -80 mV. An increase in the excitability of neurons (as measured by responses to identical intracellularly applied depolarizing current pulses) during the depolarizing responses was due to the increase in steady state inward current. When intracellular DC current of equal amplitude but opposite polarity was applied, no increase in excitability was observed. This response was always blocked by the addition of atropine (0.5-1 microM) to the perfusate. The hyperpolarizing response was observed as an increase in outward current due to an increase in conductance with marked voltage sensitivity (over the range of -100 to -50 mV) characteristic of the anomalous rectifier. Preliminary data indicated that the hyperpolarizing response was more sensitive to pirenzepine (complete blockade at 1.0 microM) than the depolarizing response (complete blockade at 2 microM) but neither response was affected by pirenzepine concentrations of 200 nM or less. Cholinergic effects on evoked depolarizing PSPs were examined on neurons with depolarizing (n = 3) and biphasic (n = 1) responses and in all cases, the PSPs were enhanced. This enhancement was blocked by atropine. In conclusion, it is suggested that activation of two different muscarinic receptors (neither of which is the M1 receptor) on mPRF neurons results in two different responses, a decrease in a voltage-insensitive potassium conductance and an increase in the anomalous rectifier.
在体内向脑桥内侧网状结构微量注射胆碱能化合物,根据注射部位不同,可产生部分或全部快速眼动睡眠现象,从而提供了关于这种行为状态的唯一充分药理学模型。最近证实了一种向内侧脑桥网状结构的胆碱能投射这一必要的解剖学基础,然而胆碱能激动剂对内侧脑桥网状结构神经元的直接作用尚不清楚。我们研究了卡巴胆碱对从8 - 10日龄的斯普拉格-道利大鼠脑干切片中体外记录的内侧脑桥网状结构神经元的影响。观察到对应用卡巴胆碱(0.5 - 1微摩尔)有三种反应(n = 15),如下:去极化反应(67%)、超极化反应(20%)和由超极化反应后接去极化反应组成的双相反应(13%)。在电压钳控制下,去极化反应表现为由于电导降低导致的内向电流,在 - 100至 - 50毫伏的膜电位范围内该电流恒定。反转电位负于 - 80毫伏。在去极化反应期间神经元兴奋性增加(通过对相同细胞内施加的去极化电流脉冲的反应来测量)是由于稳态内向电流增加。当施加等幅度但相反极性的细胞内直流电流时,未观察到兴奋性增加。这种反应总是被向灌流液中添加阿托品(0.5 - 1微摩尔)所阻断。超极化反应表现为由于电导增加导致的外向电流增加,具有异常整流器特有的明显电压敏感性(在 - 100至 - 50毫伏范围内)。初步数据表明,超极化反应比去极化反应对哌仑西平更敏感(在1.0微摩尔时完全阻断),而去极化反应在2微摩尔时完全阻断,但两种反应均不受200纳摩尔或更低浓度哌仑西平的影响。在具有去极化反应(n = 3)和双相反应(n = 1)的神经元上研究了胆碱能对诱发的去极化兴奋性突触后电位的影响,在所有情况下,兴奋性突触后电位均增强。这种增强被阿托品阻断。总之,提示内侧脑桥网状结构神经元上两种不同的毒蕈碱受体(均不是M1受体)的激活导致两种不同反应,即电压不敏感钾电导降低和异常整流器增加。