• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践中的模糊性?英国护理人员在个性化社会护理中的角色。

Ambiguity in practice? Carers' roles in personalised social care in England.

作者信息

Glendinning Caroline, Mitchell Wendy, Brooks Jenni

机构信息

Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12123. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.12123
PMID:25332011
Abstract

Carers play an ambiguous role within the personalisation paradigm currently shaping adult social care practice in England. Although carers have rights to assessments and support in their own right, these rights sit uneasily alongside the practices of assessment, support planning and personal budget (PB) allocation for older and disabled people. This paper reports how 14 dyads of older and learning disabled people with cognitive and/or communication impairments and their carers viewed the roles - desired and actual - played by carers in PBs. Interviews with carers and with older and disabled people were conducted during 2012 as part of a wider study into carers' roles in assessment, support planning and managing PBs. The interviews complemented a survey of reported practice in two English regions - interviews with adult social care services senior managers and focus groups with front-line care managers. Talking Mats(©) were used to support interviews with some service users. Interviews were transcribed and data analysed using the Framework approach. The interviews indicated that carers played important roles in service users' assessments and support planning, but were less likely to report receiving assessments or support of their own. While carers had the potential to benefit from PBs and support arrangements for service users, this did not reflect practice that aimed to enhance choice and control for carers. The paper draws on Twigg's typology of service conceptualisations of family carers and concludes that, despite the important social rights won by carers in England, current practice continues to regard carers primarily as a resource or a co-worker, rather than a co-client.

摘要

在当前塑造英格兰成人社会护理实践的个性化范式中,护理人员扮演着模糊的角色。尽管护理人员本身有权接受评估和获得支持,但这些权利与针对老年人和残疾人的评估、支持计划及个人预算(PB)分配的实践并不协调。本文报告了14对患有认知和/或沟通障碍的老年人及学习障碍者与其护理人员如何看待护理人员在个人预算方面所扮演的期望角色和实际角色。作为一项关于护理人员在评估、支持计划和管理个人预算中角色的更广泛研究的一部分,于2012年对护理人员以及老年人和残疾人进行了访谈。这些访谈补充了对英格兰两个地区报告实践的调查——对成人社会护理服务高级管理人员的访谈以及与一线护理管理人员的焦点小组访谈。使用“谈话垫”(©)来支持对一些服务使用者的访谈。访谈进行了转录,并采用框架法对数据进行了分析。访谈表明,护理人员在服务使用者的评估和支持计划中发挥着重要作用,但他们自己接受评估或获得支持的情况却较少被报告。虽然护理人员有可能从个人预算和服务使用者的支持安排中受益,但这并未反映出旨在增强护理人员选择权和控制权的实践。本文借鉴了特威格关于家庭护理人员服务概念化的类型学,并得出结论,尽管护理人员在英格兰赢得了重要的社会权利,但当前的实践仍然主要将护理人员视为一种资源或同事,而非共同客户。

相似文献

1
Ambiguity in practice? Carers' roles in personalised social care in England.实践中的模糊性?英国护理人员在个性化社会护理中的角色。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12123. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
2
Developing the knowledge base about carers and personalisation: contributions made by an exploration of carers' perspectives on personal budgets and the carer-service user relationship.构建关于照料者及个性化的知识库:通过探究照料者对个人预算及照料者与服务使用者关系的看法所做出的贡献。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12131. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
3
Good practice in social care: the views of people with severe and complex needs and those who support them.社会关怀中的良好实践:有严重复杂需求的人群及其支持者的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Nov;22(6):588-97. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12105. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
4
Carer assessment: continuing tensions and dilemmas for social care practice.照顾者评估:社会护理实践中持续存在的紧张关系和困境
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12115. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
The role of family carers in the use of personal budgets by people with mental health problems.家庭照顾者在有心理健康问题的人使用个人预算方面所起的作用。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jan;25(1):158-166. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12286. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
6
Who cares for the carers at hospital discharge at the end of life? A qualitative study of current practice in discharge planning and the potential value of using The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) Approach.临终关怀阶段,医院出院时谁来照顾护理人员?对现行出院计划实践的定性研究以及使用护理人员支持需求评估工具(CSNAT)方法的潜在价值。
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):939-949. doi: 10.1177/0269216318756259. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
Development of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: a qualitative study.开发一种用于家庭临终关怀实践的照顾者支持需求评估工具(CSNAT):一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;27(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0269216312440607. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
8
The need for support services for family carers of people with motor neurone disease (MND): views of current and former family caregivers a qualitative study.需要为肌萎缩侧索硬化症(MND)患者的家庭护理者提供支持服务:当前和以前的家庭护理者的观点一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):247-56. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.605511.
9
Carer participation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: a challenge for interprofessional working.英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰地区护理人员的参与:跨专业合作面临的挑战。
J Interprof Care. 2007 Jun;21(3):303-17. doi: 10.1080/13561820701327822.
10
'It's the system working for the system': carers' experiences of learning disability services in Ireland.“这是为系统而运作的系统”:爱尔兰护理人员对学习障碍服务的体验
Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Feb;17(1):92-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00807.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Individualized funding interventions to improve health and social care outcomes for people with a disability: A mixed-methods systematic review.个性化资金干预措施改善残疾人健康和社会护理结果:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;15(1-2):e1008. doi: 10.4073/csr.2019.3. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
"Caregiving is like on the job training but nobody has the manual": Canadian caregivers' perceptions of their roles within the healthcare system.“照护工作就像是在职培训,但却没有人有操作手册”:加拿大照护者对其在医疗体系中角色的看法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02354-z.
3
Are reasons for care-giving related to carers' care-related quality of life and strain? Evidence from a survey of carers in England.
照顾的原因与照顾者的照顾相关生活质量和压力有关吗?来自英格兰照顾者调查的证据。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):151-160. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12634. Epub 2018 Jul 31.