Thrippleton Michael J, Munro Kirsty I, McKillop Graham, Newby David E, Marshall Ian, Roberts Neil, Critchley Hilary O D
Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Reprod Sci. 2015 Jan;22(1):15-22. doi: 10.1177/1933719114553451. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
The aim of our study was to develop a reliable technique for measuring volume of the fibroid uterus using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We applied the Cavalieri method and standard calliper technique to measure the volume of the uterus and largest fibroid in 26 patients, and results were compared with "gold-standard" planimetry measurements. We found Cavalieri measurements to be unbiased, while calliper measurements systematically underestimated uterine volume (- 13.2%, P < 10(-5)) and had greater variance. Repeatability was similar for the 2 techniques (standard deviation [SD] = 4.0%-6.9%). Reproducibility of Cavalieri measurements was higher for measurement of uterine (SD = 9.0%) than fibroid volume (SD = 19.1%), whereas the reproducibility of calliper measurements was higher for fibroid (SD = 9.1%) than uterine volume (SD = 15.9%). The additional measurement time for the Cavalieri method was approximately 1 to 2 minutes. In conclusion, the Cavalieri method permits more accurate measurement of uterine and fibroid volumes and is suitable for application in both clinical practice and scientific research.
我们研究的目的是开发一种利用磁共振成像测量子宫肌瘤子宫体积的可靠技术。我们应用卡瓦列里方法和标准卡尺技术测量了26例患者的子宫和最大肌瘤的体积,并将结果与“金标准”面积测量法进行了比较。我们发现卡瓦列里测量无偏差,而卡尺测量系统性地低估了子宫体积(-13.2%,P<10⁻⁵)且方差更大。两种技术的重复性相似(标准差[SD]=4.0%-6.9%)。卡瓦列里测量子宫体积的再现性(SD=9.0%)高于肌瘤体积(SD=19.1%),而卡尺测量肌瘤体积的再现性(SD=9.1%)高于子宫体积(SD=15.9%)。卡瓦列里方法额外的测量时间约为1至2分钟。总之,卡瓦列里方法能更准确地测量子宫和肌瘤体积,适用于临床实践和科研。