Trevisan Lauren
Am Univ Law Rev. 2011;61(2):385-430.
Expressing its concern about growing rates of cancer and other diseases, coupled with the lack of data about the effect of the thousands of chemicals used in U.S. society, in 1976 Congress enacted the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Congress intended for TSCA to shed new light on chemical risks and provide the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with a set of tools to address those risks and protect human health and the environment. In the years since TSCA's passage, the procedural hurdles and the difficult-to-meet legal standards built into the statute, along with a court decision rejecting EPA's use of its authority to ban dangerous chemicals, have impeded EPA's ability to regulate chemical use and manufacture. This Comment argues that both the EPA and state governments have the authority to act now to address the risks posed by dangerous chemicals. By utilizing certain sections of the statute in new and aggressive ways, EPA can effectively address chemical risks. Further, this Comment argues that TSCA's preemption provision affords states leeway to continue to regulate the use of chemicals within their borders. Though reform of TSCA is necessary, EPA and states can effectively protect against chemical risks in the near-term by using the full extent of their authority under the current law.
鉴于对癌症和其他疾病发病率不断上升的担忧,再加上缺乏关于美国社会所使用的数千种化学品影响的数据,国会于1976年颁布了《有毒物质控制法》(TSCA)。国会旨在通过TSCA来揭示化学风险,并为美国环境保护局(EPA)提供一系列应对这些风险以及保护人类健康和环境的工具。自TSCA通过后的数年里,该法规所设置的程序障碍和难以满足的法律标准,再加上一项拒绝EPA运用其权力禁止危险化学品的法院判决,已经阻碍了EPA对化学品使用和制造进行监管的能力。本评论认为,EPA和州政府现在都有权采取行动来应对危险化学品所带来的风险。通过以新的、积极的方式运用该法规的某些条款,EPA能够有效应对化学风险。此外,本评论认为TSCA的优先适用条款给予了各州在其境内继续监管化学品使用的余地。尽管对TSCA进行改革是必要的,但EPA和各州可以通过充分运用现行法律赋予它们的权力,在短期内有效防范化学风险。