School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(5):D87-94. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.677802.
Dr. Michael P. Wilson of UC Berkeley delivered his keynote address before the general assembly of the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exhibition (AIHce) in Portland, Oregon, in May 2011. Here, Dr. Wilson again discusses the political and economic drivers of occupational disease in the United States and proposes a role for AIHA in helping to highlight and resolve them. He proposes that until these underlying drivers are acknowledged and ameliorated, the toll of occupational disease will persist, despite the hard work of industrial hygienists in the workplace. Among these drivers, Dr. Wilson points to the decline of labor rights and unionization; economic inequality; economic insecurity; political resistance to public health protections for workers, notably the OSHA and NIOSH programs; and weaknesses in the Federal Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA). Of these, Dr. Wilson calls on the AIHA to participate in the historic effort to rewrite TSCA. He points to weaknesses in TSCA that have produced a chemicals market dominated by the function, price, and performance of chemicals, with little attention given to their health and environmental effects. Under these conditions, he argues, hazardous chemicals have remained economically competitive, and innovation in inherently safer chemicals-in green chemistry-has been held back by a lack of market transparency and public accountability in the industry. TSCA reform has the potential to shift the market toward green chemistry, with long-term implications for occupational disease prevention, industrial investment, and renewed energy in the industrial hygiene profession. Dr. Wilson proposes that, like previous legislative changes in the United States, TSCA reform is likely to occur in response to myriad social pressures, which include the emergence of the European Union's REACH regulation; recent chemicals policy actions in 18 U.S. states; growing support from downstream businesses; increasing public awareness; and a social movement that reaches across traditional boundaries. Dr. Wilson urges the AIHA to involve itself in this effort by building alliances with professional associations and other groups that share similar goals.
加州大学伯克利分校的迈克尔·P·威尔逊博士于 2011 年 5 月在俄勒冈州波特兰举行的美国工业卫生大会和展览(AIHce)全体会议上发表了主题演讲。在这里,威尔逊博士再次讨论了美国职业病的政治和经济驱动因素,并提议美国工业卫生协会(AIHA)在帮助突出和解决这些问题方面发挥作用。他提出,除非这些潜在的驱动因素得到承认和改善,否则尽管工业卫生学家在工作场所付出了艰苦的努力,职业病的代价仍将持续。在这些驱动因素中,威尔逊博士指出了劳工权利和工会组织的衰落;经济不平等;经济不安全;对工人的职业健康保护措施(尤其是 OSHA 和 NIOSH 计划)的政治抵制;以及 1976 年《联邦有毒物质控制法》(TSCA)的弱点。在这些因素中,威尔逊博士呼吁 AIHA 参与改写 TSCA 的历史性努力。他指出,TSCA 的弱点导致了一个以化学品的功能、价格和性能为主导的化学品市场,而对其健康和环境影响关注甚少。他认为,在这种情况下,危险化学品在经济上仍具有竞争力,而绿色化学中内在更安全的化学品的创新则因该行业缺乏市场透明度和公众问责制而受到阻碍。TSCA 改革有可能使市场转向绿色化学,从而对职业病预防、工业投资和工业卫生行业的新活力产生长期影响。威尔逊博士提议,与美国以前的立法变革一样,TSCA 改革可能是对众多社会压力的回应,其中包括欧盟 REACH 法规的出现;18 个美国州最近的化学品政策行动;下游企业越来越多的支持;公众意识的提高;以及跨越传统界限的社会运动。威尔逊博士敦促 AIHA 通过与具有相似目标的专业协会和其他团体建立联盟,参与这项工作。