Jain Deepika, Sheth Heena, Bender Filitsa H, Weisbord Steven D, Green Jamie A
Adv Perit Dial. 2014;30:27-30.
Studies have shown that a single-item question might be useful in identifying patients with limited health literacy. However, the utility of the approach has not been studied in patients receiving maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD). We assessed health literacy in a cohort of 31 PD patients by administering the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and a single-item health literacy (SHL) screening question "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" (Extremely, Quite a bit, Somewhat, A little bit, or Not at all). To determine the accuracy of the single-item question for detecting limited health literacy, we performed sensitivity and specificity analyses of the SHL and plotted the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve using the REALM as a reference standard. Using a cut-off of "Somewhat" or less confident, the sensitivity of the SHL for detecting limited health literacy was 80%, and the specificity was 88%. The positive likelihood ratio was 6.9. The SHL had an AUROC of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 1.00). Our results show that the SHL could be effective in detecting limited health literacy in PD patients.
研究表明,单项问题可能有助于识别健康素养有限的患者。然而,该方法在接受维持性腹膜透析(PD)的患者中的效用尚未得到研究。我们通过实施成人医学快速识字评估(REALM)和一个单项健康素养(SHL)筛查问题“你对自己填写医疗表格有多自信?”(非常自信、相当自信、有点自信、有点不自信或完全不自信),对31名PD患者进行了健康素养评估。为了确定单项问题检测有限健康素养的准确性,我们对SHL进行了敏感性和特异性分析,并以REALM作为参考标准绘制了受试者操作特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积。使用“有点不自信”或更低的自信度作为临界值,SHL检测有限健康素养的敏感性为80%,特异性为88%。阳性似然比为6.9。SHL的AUROC为0.79(95%置信区间:0.52至1.00)。我们的结果表明,SHL在检测PD患者有限健康素养方面可能是有效的。