Suppr超能文献

基于幅度的呼吸门控PET和CT图像空间对准方面的自由呼吸CT与呼气屏气CT的比较。

Comparison of a free-breathing CT and an expiratory breath-hold CT with regard to spatial alignment of amplitude-based respiratory-gated PET and CT images.

作者信息

van der Vos Charlotte S, Grootjans Willem, Meeuwis Antoi P W, Slump Cornelis H, Oyen Wim J G, de Geus-Oei Lioe-Fee F, Visser Eric P

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and.

出版信息

J Nucl Med Technol. 2014 Dec;42(4):269-73. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.114.145748. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Respiratory motion during PET has a significant effect on the quantification of radiotracer uptake in PET images. Even when respiratory motion is considered using PET gating techniques, inaccuracies in standardized uptake values can be caused by inappropriate attenuation correction due to a spatial mismatch between PET and CT. In this study, the effect of breath-hold CT imaging on the spatial match between CT and amplitude-based respiratory-gated PET images is investigated.

METHODS

Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed in 52 patients with 125 lung lesions. (18)F-FDG PET was performed using optimized, amplitude-based respiratory gating. For CT, 36 patients were randomly assigned to the free-breathing (FB) group and 16 to the rest-expiratory breath-hold (BH) group. Spatial mismatch between the PET and CT images was quantified by measuring the distance between the centroids of PET and CT lesions and calculating the Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC).

RESULTS

In the upper lobes, the average distance between the centroids of the PET and CT lesions was 4.7 ± 3.1 and 6.0 ± 3.0 mm for the FB and BH groups, respectively (P = 0.11). For the middle and lower lobes, the distances were 5.8 ± 4.3 and 5.1 ± 2.9 mm (P = 0.70), respectively, and for the central region 4.8 ± 4.6 and 5.6 ± 2.0 mm (P = 0.24), respectively. The JSC for the upper lobes was 0.28 ± 0.17 and 0.28 ± 0.19, for the FB and the BH group, respectively (P = 0.83). For the middle and lower lobes, the JSC was 0.22 ± 0.16 and 0.28 ± 0.18 (P = 0.20), respectively, and for the central region 0.39 ± 0.17 and 0.13 ± 0.04 (P = 0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Providing breathing instructions to the patients during the CT acquisition did not improve the spatial alignment between the respiratory-gated PET images and the CT images. The difficulty experienced in using this clinical protocol, such as patient compliance and operator dependence, emphasizes the need for other strategies.

摘要

未标注

PET 检查期间的呼吸运动会对 PET 图像中放射性示踪剂摄取的定量产生显著影响。即使使用 PET 门控技术来考虑呼吸运动,由于 PET 与 CT 之间的空间不匹配导致的不适当衰减校正,仍可能导致标准化摄取值不准确。在本研究中,研究了屏气 CT 成像对 CT 与基于幅度的呼吸门控 PET 图像之间空间匹配的影响。

方法

对 52 例患有 125 个肺部病变的患者进行全身(18)F-FDG PET/CT 成像。(18)F-FDG PET 使用优化的基于幅度的呼吸门控进行。对于 CT,36 例患者被随机分配到自由呼吸(FB)组,16 例被分配到呼气末屏气(BH)组。通过测量 PET 和 CT 病变质心之间的距离并计算杰卡德相似系数(JSC)来量化 PET 和 CT 图像之间的空间不匹配。

结果

在上叶,FB 组和 BH 组中 PET 和 CT 病变质心之间的平均距离分别为 4.7±3.1 和 6.0±3.0 毫米(P = 0.11)。对于中叶和下叶,距离分别为 5.8±4.3 和 5.1±2.9 毫米(P = 0.70),对于中央区域分别为 4.8±4.6 和 5.6±2.0 毫米(P = 0.24)。FB 组和 BH 组上叶的 JSC 分别为 0.28±0.17 和 0.28±0.19(P = 0.83)。对于中叶和下叶,JSC 分别为 0.22±0.16 和 0.28±0.18(P = 0.20),对于中央区域分别为 0.39±0.17 和 0.13±0.04(P = 0.04)。

结论

在 CT 采集期间向患者提供呼吸指导并不能改善呼吸门控 PET 图像与 CT 图像之间的空间对齐。使用这种临床方案所遇到的困难,如患者依从性和操作者依赖性,强调了需要其他策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验