Suppr超能文献

为非专业人士重塑生物伦理学教育:来自认知人类学和教育理论的经验教训。

Reframing bioethics education for non-professionals: lessons from cognitive anthropology and education theory.

作者信息

Emmerich Nathan

机构信息

School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen's University Belfast.

出版信息

New Bioeth. 2014;20(2):186-98. doi: 10.1179/2050287714Z.00000000052.

Abstract

It is increasingly common for universities to provide cross-curricular education in bioethics as part of contemporary attempts to produce 'global citizens.' In this article I examine three perspectives drawn from research into pedagogy that has been conducted from the perspective of cognitive anthropology and consider its relevance to bioethics education. I focus on: two metaphors of learning, participation and acquisition, identified by Sfard; the psychological notion of moral development; and the distinction between socialization and enculturation. Two of these perspectives have been particularly fruitful in understanding the processes of teaching and learning in a variety of domains. The third perspective has been developed in relation to the formal ethical education of medical students. I examine their relevance for 'non-professional' bioethics education suggesting that if we take seriously the idea that it is part of 'educating for citizenship' then the distinction between 'ethics' and 'politics' is blurred as such programmes aim at the development of student's political subjectivity.

摘要

大学提供生物伦理学跨课程教育越来越普遍,这是当代培养“全球公民”努力的一部分。在本文中,我审视了从认知人类学视角开展的教育学研究中得出的三种观点,并思考其与生物伦理学教育的相关性。我关注以下几点:斯法德所确定的两种学习隐喻,即参与和习得;道德发展的心理学概念;以及社会化与文化适应之间的区别。其中两种观点在理解各个领域的教学过程方面成果颇丰。第三种观点是针对医学生的正式伦理教育而发展起来的。我探讨了它们与“非专业”生物伦理学教育的相关性,表明如果我们认真对待生物伦理学教育是“公民教育”一部分这一观点,那么“伦理学”与“政治学”之间的区别就会变得模糊,因为此类课程旨在培养学生的政治主体性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验