有症状的关节外股骨髋臼撞击症患者的人口统计学和影像学特征是什么?

What are the demographic and radiographic characteristics of patients with symptomatic extraarticular femoroacetabular impingement?

作者信息

Ricciardi Benjamin F, Fabricant Peter D, Fields Kara G, Poultsides Lazaros, Zaltz Ira, Sink Ernest L

机构信息

Center for Hip Pain and Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, 541 East 71th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1299-308. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4001-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extraarticular femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can result in symptomatic hip pain, but preoperative demographic, radiographic, and physical examination findings have not been well characterized.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to (1) define the demographic characteristics of patients with symptomatic extraarticular FAI; and (2) identify relevant radiographic and physical examination findings that are associated with intraoperative locations of extraarticular FAI.

METHODS

For purposes of this study, we defined extraarticular FAI as abnormal contact between the extraarticular regions of the proximal femur (greater trochanter, lesser trochanter, extracapsular femoral neck) and the ilium or ischium. The diagnosis was suspected preoperatively, but it was confirmed at the time of surgery by direct visualization of extraarticular impingement after surgical hip dislocation. A prospective single-center hip preservation registry was used to retrospectively characterize patients presenting between October 2010 and November 2013 with symptomatic hip pain and intraoperative findings of extraarticular FAI (N = 75 patients, 86 hips). Detailed demographic data were recorded. Radiographs, CT, and MRI scans were reviewed for all patients by two of the authors (BFR, ELS). Outcome instruments including modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) were assessed preoperatively. A comparison group of all patients (N = 1690 patients, 1989 hips) undergoing surgery for intraarticular FAI over the study period were included for demographic comparisons. Cases with extraarticular FAI accounted for 4% (75 of 1765 patients) of our cohort over the study time period.

RESULTS

Patients with extraarticular FAI were more likely to be younger (mean ± SD, 24 ± 7 years versus 30 ± 11 years; difference [95% confidence interval {CI}], -7 [-9 to -4]; p < 0.001), female (85% versus 49%; odds ratio [95% CI], 6 [3 to 12]; p < 0.001), to have undergone prior hip surgery (44% versus 10%; odds ratio [95% CI], 9 (6 to 15); p < 0.001), and have lower preoperative outcome scores after adjustment for age, sex, and revision status (mHHS 55 ± 15 versus 63 ± 15; adjusted difference [95% CI], -4 (-8 to -1); p = 0.017; HOS ADL 64 ± 19 versus 73 ± 18; adjusted difference [95% CI], -7 (-11 to -3); p = 0.002) than patients undergoing surgery for intraarticular FAI. Within the extraarticular FAI group, preoperative femoral version on CT was different among patients with anterior versus posterior extraarticular impingement (median [first quartile, third quartile], 8° [2, 18] versus 21° [20, 30], respectively; p = 0.005) and anterior versus complex extraarticular impingement (median [first quartile, third quartile], 8° [2, 18] versus 20° [10, 30], respectively; p = 0.007]. Preoperative external rotation in extension was increased in patients with anterior versus complex extraarticular FAI (median [first quartile, third quartile], 70° [55, 75] versus 40° [20, 60]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Extraarticular FAI is an uncommon source of impingement symptoms. We suspect the diagnosis often is missed, because many of these patients had prior hip surgery before the procedure that diagnosed the extraarticular impingement source. This diagnosis seems more common in younger, female patients. Radiographic and physical examination findings correspond to locations of intraoperative extraarticular impingement. Future studies will need to determine whether surgical treatment of extraarticular impingement pathology improves pain and function in this subset of patients.

摘要

背景

关节外股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)可导致有症状的髋关节疼痛,但术前的人口统计学、影像学及体格检查结果尚未得到充分描述。

问题/目的:本研究的目的是:(1)明确有症状的关节外FAI患者的人口统计学特征;(2)识别与关节外FAI术中位置相关的影像学及体格检查结果。

方法

在本研究中,我们将关节外FAI定义为股骨近端(大转子、小转子、关节囊外股骨颈)的关节外区域与髂骨或坐骨之间的异常接触。术前怀疑有该诊断,但在手术时通过髋关节脱位后直接观察关节外撞击得以证实。使用前瞻性单中心髋关节保留登记系统对2010年10月至2013年11月间因有症状的髋关节疼痛且术中发现关节外FAI的患者进行回顾性分析(N = 75例患者,86髋)。记录详细的人口统计学数据。两位作者(BFR、ELS)对所有患者的X线片、CT及MRI扫描进行了评估。术前评估了包括改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、髋关节结局评分(HOS)及国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT - 33)等结局指标。纳入了研究期间因关节内FAI接受手术的所有患者组成的对照组(N = 1690例患者,1989髋)进行人口统计学比较。在研究时间段内,关节外FAI病例占我们队列的4%(1765例患者中的75例)。

结果

与因关节内FAI接受手术的患者相比,关节外FAI患者更可能较年轻(平均±标准差,24±7岁对30±11岁;差异[95%置信区间{CI}], - 7[-9至 - 4];p < 0.001)、为女性(85%对49%;比值比[95%CI],6[3至12];p < 0.001)、曾接受过髋关节手术(44%对1%;比值比[95%CI],9[6至15];p < 0.001),且在调整年龄、性别及翻修状态后术前结局评分较低(mHHS 55±15对63±15;调整后差异[95%CI], - 4[-8至 - 1];p = 0.017;HOS日常生活活动能力评分64±19对73±18;调整后差异[95%CI], - 7[-11至 - 3];p = 0.002)。在关节外FAI组中,前侧与后侧关节外撞击患者术前CT上的股骨扭转角度不同(中位数[第一四分位数,第三四分位数],分别为8°[2,18]对21°[20,30];p = 0.005),前侧与复杂关节外撞击患者也不同(中位数[第一四分位数,第三四分位数],分别为8°[2,18]对20°[10,30];p = 0.007]。前侧与复杂关节外FAI患者术前伸直位外旋增加(中位数[第一四分位数,第三四分位数],70°[55,75]对40°[20,60];p < 0.001)。

结论

关节外FAI是撞击症状的罕见原因。我们怀疑该诊断常被漏诊,因为这些患者中有许多在诊断出关节外撞击源的手术前曾接受过髋关节手术。该诊断在年轻女性患者中似乎更常见。影像学及体格检查结果与术中关节外撞击位置相符。未来研究需要确定关节外撞击病变的手术治疗是否能改善该亚组患者的疼痛及功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索