• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项离散选择实验方案:了解澳大利亚大城市和农村地区癌症患者对其癌症护理的偏好。

A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia.

作者信息

Wong Shu Fen, Norman Richard, Dunning Trisha L, Ashley David M, Lorgelly Paula K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 24;4(10):e006661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661
PMID:25344489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4212188/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical decision-making in oncology is a complicated process and to date there are few studies examining how patients with cancer make choices with respect to different features of their care. It is also unknown whether patient choices vary by geographical location and how location could account for observed rural and metropolitan cancer differences. This paper describes an ongoing study that aims to (1) examine patient and healthcare-related factors that influence choices of patients with cancer; (2) measure and quantify preferences of patients with cancer towards cancer care using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and (3) explore preference heterogeneity between metropolitan and rural locations.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A DCE is being conducted to understand how patients with cancer choose between two clinical scenarios accounting for different patient and healthcare-related factors (and levels). Preliminary qualitative research was undertaken to guide the development of an appropriate DCE design including characteristics that are important and relevant to patients with cancer. A fractional factorial design using the D-efficiency criteria was used to estimate interactions among attributes. Multinomial logistic regression will be used for the primary DCE analysis and to control for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study. Findings from the study will be presented in national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Our results will form the basis of a feasibility study to inform the development of a larger scale study into preferences of patients with cancer and their association with cancer outcomes.

摘要

引言

肿瘤学中的医疗决策是一个复杂的过程,迄今为止,很少有研究探讨癌症患者如何就其治疗的不同特征做出选择。患者的选择是否因地理位置而异,以及地理位置如何解释观察到的农村和大都市地区的癌症差异,目前也尚不清楚。本文描述了一项正在进行的研究,其目的是:(1)研究影响癌症患者选择的患者及医疗相关因素;(2)使用离散选择实验(DCE)测量和量化癌症患者对癌症治疗的偏好;(3)探索大都市和农村地区之间的偏好异质性。

方法与分析

正在进行一项DCE,以了解癌症患者如何在两种临床情景之间进行选择,这两种情景考虑了不同的患者及医疗相关因素(和水平)。已开展初步定性研究,以指导制定合适的DCE设计,包括对癌症患者重要且相关的特征。使用D效率标准的分数析因设计来估计属性之间的相互作用。多项逻辑回归将用于主要的DCE分析,并控制社会人口统计学和临床特征。

伦理与传播

巴旺健康人类研究伦理委员会批准了该研究。该研究的结果将在国内/国际会议和同行评审期刊上发表。我们的结果将构成一项可行性研究的基础,为开展一项关于癌症患者偏好及其与癌症结局关联的更大规模研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e77/4212188/2abd3cae0dc3/bmjopen2014006661f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e77/4212188/f9192abccec7/bmjopen2014006661f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e77/4212188/2abd3cae0dc3/bmjopen2014006661f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e77/4212188/f9192abccec7/bmjopen2014006661f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e77/4212188/2abd3cae0dc3/bmjopen2014006661f02.jpg

相似文献

1
A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia.一项离散选择实验方案:了解澳大利亚大城市和农村地区癌症患者对其癌症护理的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 24;4(10):e006661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661.
2
Preferences for ARV-based HIV prevention methods among men and women, adolescent girls and female sex workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.南非豪登省男性、女性、少女及女性性工作者对基于抗逆转录病毒药物的艾滋病毒预防方法的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 27;6(6):e010682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010682.
3
Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments.澳大利亚社会和个人对生育治疗的偏好评估:基于陈述偏好离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e020509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509.
4
Eliciting gastric cancer survivors' preferences for follow-up services: a discrete choice experiment protocol.探索胃癌幸存者对随访服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):e049742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049742.
5
Patient and caregiver preferences for home dialysis-the home first study: a protocol for qualitative interviews and discrete choice experiments.患者及照护者对家庭透析的偏好——“家庭优先”研究:一项定性访谈和离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e007405. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007405.
6
Prescriber decision-making on antithrombotic therapy after endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.经皮腔内血管介入治疗外周动脉疾病后抗血栓治疗的决策者选择:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e079668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079668.
7
Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.公众、医学专业人员和患者对移植供体器官分配的偏好:离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e026040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026040.
8
Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover-using preferences to inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol.患者和护士对护士交接班的偏好——运用偏好为政策提供信息:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 11;5(11):e008941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941.
9
A Discrete Choice Experiment to Examine the Preferences of Patients With Cancer and Their Willingness to Pay for Different Types of Health Care Appointments.一项离散选择实验,用于研究癌症患者的偏好及其为不同类型医疗预约支付费用的意愿。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Mar;14(3):311-9. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0036. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
10
Preferences of people with mild cognitive impairment for physical activity interventions in China: protocol for a discrete choice experiment study.轻度认知障碍患者对中国身体活动干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 14;12(10):e064153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064153.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.年轻成年人对粪便免疫化学检测选项的个体偏好:一项离散选择实验
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8.
2
Female sex worker preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery in Uganda: A discrete choice experiment.乌干达女性性工作者对艾滋病病毒暴露前预防服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 24;5(6):e0003848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003848. eCollection 2025.
3
Primary Care Provider Preferences Regarding Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Cancer Screening.

本文引用的文献

1
Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information sources among rural and urban adults in the USA.美国城乡成年人的宿命论癌症观念及信息来源
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Sep;28(3):521-6. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0496-7.
2
Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.健康经济学和卫生服务研究中的有序偏好 elicitation 方法:使用离散选择实验和排序方法。
Br Med Bull. 2012 Sep;103(1):21-44. doi: 10.1093/bmb/lds020. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
3
Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I-All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II-Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical Cancers.
初级保健提供者对即时癌症筛查中人工智能的偏好
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Apr 4;10(1):23814683251329007. doi: 10.1177/23814683251329007. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
Protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences for seeking health services for survivors of sexual violence in Uganda.一项离散选择实验的方案:了解乌干达性暴力幸存者寻求健康服务的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e081663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081663.
5
Investigating consumer preferences and experiences of telehealth services in Australian allied health practice: a study protocol.调查澳大利亚联合健康实践中消费者对远程医疗服务的偏好和体验:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e082577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082577.
6
Consumer Preferences for a Healthcare Appointment Reminder in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.澳大利亚消费者对医疗预约提醒的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):537-550. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00692-9. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
7
Eliciting preferences for continuing medication among adult patients and parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.成人患者和儿童注意缺陷多动障碍患者父母对继续用药的偏好评估。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):1094-1107. doi: 10.1111/hex.13462. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Developing a patient-centered community-based model for management of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment.在乌干达开发以患者为中心的社区为基础的耐多药结核病管理模式:离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07365-5.
9
Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.应答者理解在离散选择实验中的应用:范围综述。
Patient. 2021 Jan;14(1):17-53. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00467-y. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Preferences of people with type 2 diabetes for telemedical lifestyle programmes in Germany: protocol of a discrete choice experiment.德国2型糖尿病患者对远程医疗生活方式项目的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e036995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036995.
美国癌症死亡率中的社会经济、城乡及种族不平等:第一部分——所有癌症和肺癌,第二部分——结直肠癌、前列腺癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;2011:107497. doi: 10.1155/2011/107497. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.联合分析在健康领域的应用 - 研究如何设计和报告?:2005 年至 2008 年发表文献中当前实践的最新情况。
Patient. 2010 Dec 1;3(4):249-56. doi: 10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000.
5
Preferences for cancer treatments: an overview of methods and applications in oncology.癌症治疗偏好:肿瘤学中方法和应用概述。
Ann Oncol. 2012 May;23(5):1104-1110. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr559. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
6
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
7
Distance to the closest radiotherapy facility and survival after a diagnosis of rectal cancer in Queensland.昆士兰州距离最近的放射治疗机构的距离与直肠癌诊断后的生存情况。
Med J Aust. 2011 Sep 19;195(6):350-4. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11204.
8
The effect of race and rural residence on prostate cancer treatment choice among men in Georgia.种族和农村居住对佐治亚州男性前列腺癌治疗选择的影响。
Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.020.
9
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.结直肠癌筛查策略的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Mar 16;102(6):972-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605566. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
10
Mapping oncology services in regional and rural Australia.绘制澳大利亚地区和农村地区的肿瘤学服务情况。
Aust J Rural Health. 2009 Dec;17(6):321-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2009.01106.x.