• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并启动一种阿片类药物患者-开处方者协议模型的验证,作为以患者为中心的疼痛治疗工具。

Developing and Initiating Validation of a Model Opioid Patient-Prescriber Agreement as a Tool for Patient-Centered Pain Treatment.

作者信息

Ghods Mary P, Schmid Ian T, Pamer Carol A, Lappin Brian M, Slavin Dale C

机构信息

U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Safe Use Initiative, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA,

出版信息

Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):349-58. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0094-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-014-0094-8
PMID:25344927
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid treatment agreements generally are used in pain treatment to delineate the terms and consequences of opioid use and abuse.

METHODS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safe Use Initiative convened a multi-disciplinary working group with outside experts to draft a patient-centered, model opioid treatment agreement named the Model Patient-Prescriber Agreement (model PPA). The model PPA was evaluated for readability and usability in two tests that sampled both healthcare professional and non-healthcare professional FDA employees. In a survey sent to FDA employees in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 209 respondents assessed the quality of the content and the level of difficulty in reading and understanding the model PPA. Ten other FDA employees participated in usability testing to assess the effectiveness of the model PPA as an educational and decision-making tool.

RESULTS

The majority of the 209 CDER employee survey respondents indicated the model PPA was neutral in tone (67.5%) and easy or somewhat easy to understand (90.4%). Usability study participants generally thought the model PPA would facilitate discussion between patient and prescriber and that the content was informative, thorough, and clear.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies suggest that the working group was able to develop an opioid PPA that may be acceptable and usable among a diverse population of stakeholders. A follow-up pilot study using the model PPA in medical facilities in the USA with patients is underway and will facilitate this determination.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物治疗协议通常用于疼痛治疗,以明确阿片类药物使用及滥用的条款和后果。

方法

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)安全使用倡议召集了一个多学科工作组及外部专家,起草一份以患者为中心的阿片类药物治疗协议范本,即范本患者-开方者协议(范本PPA)。在两项对FDA医疗保健专业人员和非医疗保健专业人员员工进行抽样的测试中,对范本PPA的可读性和可用性进行了评估。在一项发给药物评价和研究中心(CDER)的FDA员工的调查中,209名受访者评估了范本PPA的内容质量以及阅读和理解的难易程度。另外10名FDA员工参与了可用性测试,以评估范本PPA作为教育和决策工具的有效性。

结果

209名CDER员工调查受访者中的大多数表示,范本PPA语气中立(67.5%),易于理解或 somewhat easy to understand(90.4%)。可用性研究参与者普遍认为,范本PPA将促进患者与开方者之间的讨论,且内容信息丰富、全面且清晰。

结论

这些研究表明,该工作组能够制定出一份在不同利益相关者群体中可能被接受且可用的阿片类药物PPA。一项在美国医疗机构对患者使用范本PPA的后续试点研究正在进行中,这将有助于做出这一判定。

相似文献

1
Developing and Initiating Validation of a Model Opioid Patient-Prescriber Agreement as a Tool for Patient-Centered Pain Treatment.开发并启动一种阿片类药物患者-开处方者协议模型的验证,作为以患者为中心的疼痛治疗工具。
Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):349-58. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0094-8.
2
A multicentre evaluation of an opioid patient-provider agreement.阿片类药物患者-提供者协议的多中心评估。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Oct;93(1104):613-617. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134607. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Clinical implications of patient-provider agreements in opioid prescribing.阿片类药物处方中患者与医疗服务提供者协议的临床意义。
Curr Drug Saf. 2015;10(2):159-64. doi: 10.2174/1574886309666140922095844.
4
Blueprint for prescriber continuing education program.处方医生继续教育项目蓝图
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;26(2):127-30. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.680013.
5
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for extended-release and long-acting opioid analgesics: considerations for palliative care practice.缓释和长效阿片类镇痛药的风险评估与缓解策略(REMS):姑息治疗实践的考量
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;26(2):136-43. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.679724.
6
Patient-Focused Drug Development: A New Direction for Collaboration.以患者为中心的药物研发:合作的新方向。
Med Care. 2015 Jan;53(1):9-17. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000273.
7
Development and impact of prescription opioid abuse deterrent formulation technologies.处方阿片类药物滥用威慑制剂技术的发展与影响
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
8
FDA opioid safety plan promotes patient, physician education to prevent abuse.美国食品药品监督管理局的阿片类药物安全计划促进对患者和医生的教育以防止滥用。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):845. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1200.
9
Zohydro approval by food and drug administration: controversial or frightening?食品和药物管理局批准佐氢可待因:有争议还是可怕?
Pain Physician. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):E437-50.
10
[Oncological patients' decision making processes concerning their pain medication at home: a qualitative secondary analysis].[肿瘤患者在家中关于止痛药物的决策过程:一项定性二次分析]
Pflege. 2012 Oct;25(5):353-62. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000231.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Management in Oncology Patients Amidst the Opioid Epidemic: How To Minimize Non-Medical Opioid Use.阿片类药物流行背景下肿瘤患者的疼痛管理:如何尽量减少非医疗用途阿片类药物的使用。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 12;13(11):e19500. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19500. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
How Do Clinicians of Different Specialties Perceive and Use Opioid Risk Mitigation Strategies? A Qualitative Study.不同专业的临床医生如何感知和使用阿片类药物风险缓解策略?一项定性研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(9):1352-1362. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1926514. Epub 2021 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
National trends in the office-based prescription of schedule II opioids.全美医生门诊开具 II 类阿片类药物的趋势
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;74(9):932-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08349.
2
The primary practice physician program for chronic pain (© 4PCP): outcomes of a primary physician-pain specialist collaboration for community-based training and support.原发性实践医师慢性疼痛方案(© 4PCP):以社区为基础的培训和支持的初级医师-疼痛专家合作的结果。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Dec;29(12):1036-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182851584.
3
Pharmaceutical overdose deaths, United States, 2010.
2010年美国药物过量致死情况
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):657-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.272.
4
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) guidelines for responsible opioid prescribing in chronic non-cancer pain: Part 2--guidance.美国介入性疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)慢性非癌痛患者阿片类药物负责任处方指南:第 2 部分——指南。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):S67-116.
5
Police officer, deal-maker, or health care provider? Moving to a patient-centered framework for chronic opioid management.警察、调解人还是医疗保健提供者?转向以患者为中心的慢性阿片类药物管理框架。
Pain Med. 2011 Jun;12(6):890-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01117.x. Epub 2011 May 3.
6
The opioid treatment agreement: a real-world perspective.阿片类药物治疗协议:基于现实世界的视角
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Nov;10(11):14-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.520587.
7
Patient compliance; wherefore art thou?患者依从性;汝在何方?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Nov;10(11):13-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.520584.
8
A rose by any other name: pain contracts/agreements.换个名字的玫瑰:疼痛契约/协议。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Nov;10(11):5-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519425.
9
Opioids, chronic pain, and addiction in primary care.基层医疗中的阿片类药物、慢性疼痛和成瘾。
J Pain. 2010 Dec;11(12):1442-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
10
Randomized trial of web-based training about opioid therapy for chronic pain.基于网络的慢性疼痛阿片类药物治疗培训的随机试验。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(6):512-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181dc7adc.