Teixeira J Pedro, Combs Sara A, Teitelbaum Isaac
Clin Nephrol. 2015 Jan;83(1):1-10. doi: 10.5414/CN108382.
Due to ongoing limitations in the availability and timeliness of kidney transplantation, most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require some form of dialysis during their lifetime. Worldwide, ESRD patients most commonly receive hemodialysis (HD) or one of two forms of peritoneal dialysis (PD), continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) or automated PD (APD). In this review, we analyze the data available from the last several decades on overall survival associated with HD as compared to PD as well as with CAPD compared to APD. Because of the inherent difficulty in randomly assigning patients to different dialysis modalities, the survival data available are virtually all observational and fraught with many confounding factors and limitations. However, over the last 10 - 15 years as overall survival of dialysis patients has steadily improved and statistical methods to analyze observational data have evolved, a pattern of virtual equivalence in survival among patients on HD vs. PD and on CAPD vs. APD has emerged. As such, impact upon lifestyle and upon quality of life likely should remain the predominant factors in guiding nephrologists and their patients in their choice of dialysis modality.
由于肾移植在可及性和及时性方面仍存在持续限制,大多数终末期肾病(ESRD)患者在其一生中都需要某种形式的透析。在全球范围内,ESRD患者最常接受血液透析(HD)或两种腹膜透析(PD)形式之一,即持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)或自动化腹膜透析(APD)。在本综述中,我们分析了过去几十年中与HD相比以及与CAPD相比与APD相关的总体生存的可用数据。由于将患者随机分配到不同透析方式存在固有困难,现有的生存数据几乎都是观察性的,并且充满了许多混杂因素和局限性。然而,在过去10至15年中,随着透析患者的总体生存率稳步提高,以及分析观察性数据的统计方法不断发展,HD与PD以及CAPD与APD患者之间的生存情况出现了几乎等效的模式。因此,对生活方式和生活质量的影响可能应仍然是指导肾病学家及其患者选择透析方式的主要因素。