• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明确的心理理论比之前所认为的更加统一:信念归因和对方面性的理解在发展过程中同时出现。

Explicit theory of mind is even more unified than previously assumed: belief ascription and understanding aspectuality emerge together in development.

作者信息

Rakoczy Hannes, Bergfeld Delia, Schwarz Ina, Fizke Ella

机构信息

University of Göttingen.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2015 Mar-Apr;86(2):486-502. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12311. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12311
PMID:25345545
Abstract

Existing evidence suggests that children, when they first pass standard theory-of-mind tasks, still fail to understand the essential aspectuality of beliefs and other propositional attitudes: such attitudes refer to objects only under specific aspects. Oedipus, for example, believes Yocaste (his mother) is beautiful, but this does not imply that he believes his mother is beautiful. In three experiments, 3- to 6-year-olds' (N = 119) understanding of aspectuality was tested with a novel, radically simplified task. In contrast to all previous findings, this task was as difficult as and highly correlated with a standard false belief task. This suggests that a conceptual capacity more unified than previously assumed emerges around ages 4-5, a full-fledged metarepresentational scheme of propositional attitudes.

摘要

现有证据表明,儿童在首次通过标准心理理论任务时,仍然无法理解信念及其他命题态度的本质特征:此类态度仅在特定方面涉及对象。例如,俄狄浦斯认为约卡斯塔(他的母亲)很漂亮,但这并不意味着他认为自己的母亲很漂亮。在三项实验中,研究人员使用一项全新的、经过大幅简化的任务,对3至6岁儿童(N = 119)对特征性的理解进行了测试。与之前所有研究结果不同的是,这项任务与标准错误信念任务难度相当且高度相关。这表明,一种比之前设想更为统一的概念能力在4至5岁左右出现,即一种成熟的命题态度元表征模式。

相似文献

1
Explicit theory of mind is even more unified than previously assumed: belief ascription and understanding aspectuality emerge together in development.明确的心理理论比之前所认为的更加统一:信念归因和对方面性的理解在发展过程中同时出现。
Child Dev. 2015 Mar-Apr;86(2):486-502. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12311. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
2
Children exhibit different performance patterns in explicit and implicit theory of mind tasks.儿童在意识理论的内隐和外显任务中表现出不同的行为模式。
Cognition. 2018 Apr;173:60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
3
Mental files theory of mind: When do children consider agents acquainted with different object identities?心理文件理论:儿童何时会将具有不同物体身份的主体视为相识?
Cognition. 2018 Feb;171:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
Children's understanding of the aspectuality of intentions.儿童对意图的方面性的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:17-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
Are there signature limits in early theory of mind?早期心理理论存在标志性限制吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:209-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Sibling composition, executive function, and children's thinking about mental diversity.兄弟姐妹构成、执行功能与儿童对心理多样性的思考。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;132:121-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
7
Understanding of Goals, Beliefs, and Desires Predicts Morally Relevant Theory of Mind: A Longitudinal Investigation.对目标、信念和欲望的理解可预测与道德相关的心理理论:一项纵向调查。
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1221-32. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12533. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
The roles of explanation and feedback in false belief understanding: a microgenetic analysis.解释与反馈在错误信念理解中的作用:一项微观发生学分析
J Genet Psychol. 2013 May-Jun;174(3):225-52. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2012.682101.
9
Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children.学前儿童内隐和外显错误信念的发展。
Dev Sci. 2017 Sep;20(5). doi: 10.1111/desc.12445. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
10
Modulation of the cortical false belief network during development.发展过程中皮层错误信念网络的调制。
Brain Res. 2010 Oct 1;1354:123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.057. Epub 2010 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensionality is more cognitively demanding than false belief in adults: evidence from a non-inferential sentence-reading task.在认知上,内涵性比成年人的错误信念更具挑战性:来自非推理句子阅读任务的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51181-w.
2
The link between emotion comprehension and cognitive perspective taking in theory of mind (ToM): a study of preschool children.心理理论(ToM)中情绪理解与认知观点采择之间的联系:一项针对学龄前儿童的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 10;14:1150959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150959. eCollection 2023.
3
Do young children track other's beliefs, or merely their perceptual access? An interactive, anticipatory measure of early theory of mind.
幼儿是追踪他人的信念,还是仅仅追踪他人的感知通达?一种早期心理理论的交互式预期测量方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):211278. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211278. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Knowledge before belief ascription? Yes and no (depending on the type of "knowledge" under consideration).在进行信念归因之前就有知识吗?答案是肯定的,也是否定的(这取决于所考虑的“知识”类型)。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:988754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988754. eCollection 2022.
5
Perceptual Access Reasoning (PAR) in Developing a Representational Theory of Mind.发展心理表象理论的知觉访问推理 (PAR)。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Sep;86(3):7-154. doi: 10.1111/mono.12432.
6
Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation.婴儿在间接错误信念任务中的表现:一种第二人称解释。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2021 May;12(3):e1551. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1551. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
The Development of Understanding Opacity in Preschoolers: A Transition From a Coarse- to Fine-Grained Understanding of Beliefs.学龄前儿童对不透明性的理解发展:从对信念的粗略理解到精细理解的转变。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 7;11:596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00596. eCollection 2020.
8
Belief and Counterfactuality: A Teleological Theory of Belief Attribution.信念与反事实性:一种信念归因的目的论理论
Z Psychol. 2018;226(2):110-121. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000327. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Metacognition and Headache: Which Is the Role in Childhood and Adolescence?元认知与头痛:在儿童和青少年时期各起什么作用?
Front Neurol. 2017 Dec 14;8:650. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00650. eCollection 2017.
10
Mental files theory of mind: When do children consider agents acquainted with different object identities?心理文件理论:儿童何时会将具有不同物体身份的主体视为相识?
Cognition. 2018 Feb;171:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 16.