Knowledge before belief ascription? Yes and no (depending on the type of "knowledge" under consideration).
作者信息
Rakoczy Hannes, Proft Marina
机构信息
Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:988754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988754. eCollection 2022.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Knowledge before belief ascription? Yes and no (depending on the type of "knowledge" under consideration).
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:988754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988754. eCollection 2022.
2
Corrigendum: Knowledge before belief ascription? Yes and no (depending on the type of "knowledge" under consideration).
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:1055960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1055960. eCollection 2022.
3
Explicit theory of mind is even more unified than previously assumed: belief ascription and understanding aspectuality emerge together in development.
Child Dev. 2015 Mar-Apr;86(2):486-502. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12311. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
4
Theory of mind: a new perspective on the puzzle of belief ascription.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 14;6:1184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01184. eCollection 2015.
5
Knowledge before belief.
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 8;44:e140. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000618.
6
Relations between verb factivity and first-order and second-order false belief understanding: Evidence from Mandarin-speaking typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorders.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2020;34(1-2):185-200. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1628810. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Matching mind to world and vice versa: Functional dissociations between belief and desire mental state processing.
Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/17470910903166853. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
8
Are there signature limits in early theory of mind?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:209-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
10
Inefficient understanding of non-factive mental verbs with social aspect in adults: comparison to cognitive factive verb processing.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Oct 10;14:2617-2631. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S165893. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
Knowledge before belief.
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 8;44:e140. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000618.
2
Do Non-Human Primates Really Represent Others' Beliefs?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):594-605. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Children's understanding of the aspectuality of intentions.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:17-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Children exhibit different performance patterns in explicit and implicit theory of mind tasks.
Cognition. 2018 Apr;173:60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Are there signature limits in early theory of mind?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:209-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):4649-4654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619717114. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
7
What Cognitive Representations Support Primate Theory of Mind?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 May;20(5):375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
8
Explicit theory of mind is even more unified than previously assumed: belief ascription and understanding aspectuality emerge together in development.
Child Dev. 2015 Mar-Apr;86(2):486-502. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12311. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Attributing false beliefs about object identity reveals a signature blind spot in humans' efficient mind-reading system.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):305-11. doi: 10.1177/0956797612451469. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
From infants' to children's appreciation of belief.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;16(10):519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
Zotero 插件