Bäumer A
Sudhoffs Arch. 1989;73(2):156-75.
At the beginning of the 19th century the term analogy was still synonymous with similarity, as for example in the case of Georges Cuvier. Exact criteria for determining analogy are first found in the work of Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. Thereupon the English scientists Sharp MacLeay, William Swainson, John Obadiah Westwood and Edwin Strickland distinguished between analogy as correspondence between certain parts of the organism, i. e. only superficial resemblance, and affinity as an essential similarity in some remarkable aspects of form. Relying on these theories Richard Owen developed his theory of analogy ("a part which has the same function as another") and homology ("the same organ in different animals under every variety of form and function"). The criteria to distinguish between these two terms had to be modified and specified when the theory of evolution was developed by Charles Darwin. In the work of Thomas Henry Huxley, Ernst Haeckel and Carl Gegenbaur the modern biological term of analogy was developed, but at the same time it lost much of its importance and homology as a criterion for natural affinity became the central objective of further biological research.
19世纪初,“类比”一词仍与“相似性”同义,例如在乔治·居维叶的例子中就是如此。确定类比的精确标准最早出现在艾蒂安·若弗鲁瓦·圣伊莱尔的著作中。随后,英国科学家夏普·麦克利、威廉·斯温森、约翰·奥巴代亚·韦斯特伍德和埃德温·斯特里克兰德区分了类比(即生物体某些部分之间的对应关系,也就是仅仅是表面上的相似)和类缘关系(即在某些显著的形态方面的本质相似)。基于这些理论,理查德·欧文发展了他的类比理论(“与另一个具有相同功能的部分”)和同源性理论(“在各种形态和功能下不同动物中的相同器官”)。当查尔斯·达尔文提出进化论时,区分这两个术语的标准不得不进行修改和细化。在托马斯·亨利·赫胥黎、恩斯特·海克尔和卡尔· Gegenbaur的著作中,现代生物学意义上的类比一词得以发展,但与此同时,它的重要性大大降低,同源性作为自然类缘关系的一个标准成为了进一步生物学研究的核心目标。