• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌的个体化手术:D1与D2淋巴结清扫术的Meta分析

Personalized Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 Lymphadenectomy.

作者信息

El-Sedfy Abraham, Dixon Matthew, Seevaratnam Rajini, Bocicariu Alina, Cardoso Roberta, Mahar Alyson, Kiss Alex, Helyer Lucy, Law Calvin, Coburn Natalie G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4168-6. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-4168-6
PMID:25348779
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent publication of 5-year survival data for the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group (IGCSG) D1 versus D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer trial adds important data for analysis of whether a D2 lymphadenectomy improves survival.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1985 to February 1, 2014. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan version 5 software. Long-term outcomes were analyzed. Subgroup analyses of T and N stage were performed.

RESULTS

Outcomes of four randomized, controlled trials involving 1,599 patients (823 D1: 776 D2) enrolled from 1982 to 2005 were included for qualitative analysis and quantitative meta-analysis. Despite the addition of long-term survival data from the IGCSG, 5-year overall and nodal status survival was similar between D1 and D2 trials. However, subgroup analysis revealed a survival benefit for T3 patients (odds ratio 1.64, 95 % confidence interval 1.01-2.67) and a trend for survival benefit for advanced nodal stage (odds ratio 1.36, 95 % confidence interval 0.98-1.87) with D2 compared with D1 lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

As recent studies have demonstrated comparable short-term surgical outcomes for both D1 and D2 lymphadenectomies, consideration should be made for more extensive lymph node dissection among patients with advanced stage.

摘要

背景

意大利胃癌研究组(IGCSG)开展的胃癌D1与D2淋巴结清扫术5年生存数据的近期发表,为分析D2淋巴结清扫术是否能提高生存率增添了重要数据。

方法

使用Medline、Embase以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,对1985年1月1日至2014年2月1日期间的文献进行系统检索。使用RevMan 5版软件进行荟萃分析。分析长期结局。对T和N分期进行亚组分析。

结果

纳入了四项随机对照试验的结果,这些试验共纳入了1982年至2005年期间的1599例患者(823例行D1淋巴结清扫术,776例行D2淋巴结清扫术),用于定性分析和定量荟萃分析。尽管增加了IGCSG的长期生存数据,但D1和D2试验的5年总生存率和淋巴结状态生存率相似。然而,亚组分析显示,与D1淋巴结清扫术相比,D2淋巴结清扫术使T3期患者有生存获益(优势比1.64,95%置信区间1.01 - 2.67),且晚期淋巴结分期有生存获益趋势(优势比1.36,95%置信区间0.98 - 1.87)。

结论

由于近期研究表明D1和D2淋巴结清扫术的短期手术结局相当,对于晚期患者应考虑进行更广泛的淋巴结清扫。

相似文献

1
Personalized Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 Lymphadenectomy.胃癌的个体化手术:D1与D2淋巴结清扫术的Meta分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4168-6. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
2
Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.胃腺癌 D1 与 D2 胃切除术的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):900-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318212bff6.
3
Does extended lymphadenectomy influence prognosis of gastric carcinoma after curative resection?扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃癌根治性切除术后的预后有影响吗?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Sep-Oct;47(35):1470-4.
4
Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial.胃癌的外科治疗:随机全国性荷兰 D1D2 试验的 15 年随访结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 May;11(5):439-49. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
5
Resection for gastric cancer in the community.社区胃癌切除术
Semin Oncol. 2005 Dec;32(6 Suppl 9):S90-3. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.010.
6
Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.胃癌腺癌扩大与有限淋巴结清扫技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD001964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001964.
7
[Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: can the type of lymphadenectomy condition the long-term results?].[胃癌全胃切除术:淋巴结清扫类型会影响长期疗效吗?]
Suppl Tumori. 2005 May-Jun;4(3):S84-5.
8
A meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 lymph node dissection.D1 与 D2 淋巴结清扫术的荟萃分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Sep;15 Suppl 1:S60-9. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0110-9. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
9
A comparison of the operative outcomes of D1 and D2 gastrectomy performed at a single Western center with multiple surgeons: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.单一西方中心多位外科医生行 D1 与 D2 胃切除术的手术结局比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1422-6.
10
WITHDRAWN: Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.撤回:胃癌腺癌扩大与有限淋巴结清扫技术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD001964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001964.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Indocyanine Green-Guided Lymphadenectomy During Gastrectomy on Survival: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.胃癌根治术中吲哚菁绿引导下淋巴结清扫对生存的影响:个体患者数据荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;17(6):980. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060980.
2
D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Advancements and Technical Considerations.胃癌的D2淋巴结清扫术:进展与技术考量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2129-2140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16545-6. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
Long-Term Impact of D2 Lymphadenectomy during Gastrectomy for Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis and Restricted Mean Survival Time Estimation.
胃癌胃切除术中D2淋巴结清扫术的长期影响:个体患者数据荟萃分析及受限平均生存时间估计
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 19;16(2):424. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020424.
4
Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions.癌症进展中的淋巴结转移:分子机制、临床意义和治疗干预。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023 Sep 27;8(1):367. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01576-4.
5
Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.胃癌淋巴结清扫的现状。
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1751-1758. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01576-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in Eastern and Western patient populations: A review of the literature and reasons for differences in outcomes.东西方患者人群中的开放性和微创手术胃切除术:文献回顾及结果差异的原因。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug;126(2):279-291. doi: 10.1002/jso.26887. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Pancreatic Fistula after D1+/D2 Radical Gastrectomy according to the Updated International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Criteria: Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences. Experience of Surgeons with High Caseloads in a Single Surgical Center in Eastern Europe.根据更新后的国际胰腺手术研究组标准,D1+/D2根治性胃切除术后的胰瘘:危险因素与临床后果。东欧单一外科中心高病例量外科医生的经验。
J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(1):16-29. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
8
Comparison of totally laparoscopic and open approach in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy - systematic review and meta-analysis.全腹腔镜与开放手术行D2淋巴结清扫全胃切除术的比较——系统评价与Meta分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Dec 6;10:6705-6714. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S182557. eCollection 2018.
9
Gastric cancer in Alaska Native people: A cancer health disparity.阿拉斯加原住民中的胃癌:癌症健康差距。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 7;24(25):2722-2732. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2722.
10
A comparison of the operative outcomes of D1 and D2 gastrectomy performed at a single Western center with multiple surgeons: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.单一西方中心多位外科医生行 D1 与 D2 胃切除术的手术结局比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1422-6.