Ikoma Naruhiko, Torres Keila E, Somaiah Neeta, Hunt Kelly K, Cormier Janice N, Tseng William, Lev Dina, Pollock Raphael, Wang Wei Lien, Feig Barry
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1068-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4210-8. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Surgery is the primary treatment for all subtypes of retroperitoneal liposarcoma, but neoadjuvant therapy may be warranted in cases of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), which has an increased risk of recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, an accurate subtype-specific diagnosis is vital for appropriate consideration of neoadjuvant therapy. Previous studies assessing the subtype-specific accuracy of percutaneous biopsy are limited. We aimed to analyze the accuracy of preoperative percutaneous biopsy in the subtype-specific diagnosis of retroperitoneal liposarcoma and thus the reliability of percutaneous biopsy in guiding decisions about neoadjuvant treatment.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records, including the pathologic reports, interventional radiology reports, and operative reports, of patients registered in the retroperitoneal/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS/DDLS) database at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1993 and 2013.
We identified 120 patients who underwent 137 preoperative percutaneous biopsies followed by surgical resections. Pathologic examination following resection indicated that 74 of the patients had WDLS and 63 had DDLS. The overall diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous biopsy for identifying the subtype of liposarcoma was 62.8 % (86/137); the accuracy for identifying WDLS was significantly higher (85.1 %; 63/74) than that for identifying DDLS (36.5 %; 23/63) (p < 0.01).
Percutaneous biopsy has low accuracy in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal DDLS. This can potentially mislead physicians in the decision to implement neoadjuvant treatment. When developing treatment strategies, including clinical trials for patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma, physicians should carefully consider the low accuracy of percutaneous biopsy in detecting DDLS.
手术是所有类型腹膜后脂肪肉瘤的主要治疗方法,但对于去分化脂肪肉瘤(DDLS),新辅助治疗可能是必要的,因为其复发和转移风险增加。因此,准确的亚型特异性诊断对于适当考虑新辅助治疗至关重要。以往评估经皮活检亚型特异性准确性的研究有限。我们旨在分析术前经皮活检在腹膜后脂肪肉瘤亚型特异性诊断中的准确性,以及经皮活检在指导新辅助治疗决策方面的可靠性。
我们回顾性分析了1993年至2013年在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心腹膜后/高分化脂肪肉瘤(WDLS/DDLS)数据库中登记的患者的病历,包括病理报告、介入放射学报告和手术报告。
我们确定了120例患者,他们接受了137次术前经皮活检,随后进行了手术切除。切除后的病理检查表明,74例患者为WDLS,63例为DDLS。经皮活检识别脂肪肉瘤亚型的总体诊断准确率为62.8%(86/137);识别WDLS的准确率(85.1%;63/74)显著高于识别DDLS的准确率(36.5%;23/63)(p<0.01)。
经皮活检在腹膜后DDLS的诊断中准确性较低。这可能会在医生决定实施新辅助治疗时产生误导。在制定治疗策略时,包括针对腹膜后脂肪肉瘤患者的临床试验,医生应仔细考虑经皮活检在检测DDLS方面的低准确性。