• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Medicare dialysis payment reform on use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents.医疗保险透析支付改革对促红细胞生成素使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):790-808. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12252. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
2
Association Between Changes in CMS Reimbursement Policy and Drug Labels for Erythrocyte-Stimulating Agents With Outcomes for Older Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Covered by Fee-for-Service Medicare.CMS 报销政策变化与接受按服务收费的 Medicare 覆盖的行血液透析老年患者结局相关的红细胞生成刺激剂药物标签之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1818-1825. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6520.
3
Bundled-rate legislation for Medicare reimbursement for dialysis services: implications for anemia management with ESAs.医疗保险透析服务偿还捆绑费率立法:对 ESA 治疗贫血管理的影响。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec;5(12):2355-62. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04820610. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
4
Bundled payment for ESRD--including ESAs in Medicare's dialysis package.终末期肾病的捆绑支付——医疗保险透析套餐中包括促红细胞生成素类似物。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 17;364(7):593-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1014187.
5
Finding a rational approach to ESA therapy--for payers and patients.为支付方和患者寻找合理的促红细胞生成素治疗方法。
Nephrol News Issues. 2007 Sep;21(10):54, 56.
6
ESA payment changes: chasing a moving target.就业与支持津贴支付变化:追逐一个移动的目标。
Nephrol News Issues. 2008 Jan;22(1):36-7.
7
When payment systems collide: the effect of hospitalization on anemia in renal dialysis patients.当支付系统发生冲突时:住院对肾透析患者贫血的影响。
Med Care. 2010 Apr;48(4):296-305. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c161ce.
8
Major declines in epoetin dosing after prospective payment system based on dialysis facility organizational status.基于透析机构组织状况的前瞻性支付系统实施后,促红细胞生成素剂量大幅下降。
Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(6):554-60. doi: 10.1159/000370334. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
9
Payment Reform and Health Disparities: Changes in Dialysis Modality under the New Medicare Dialysis Payment System.支付方式改革与健康不平等:新 Medicare 透析支付体系下透析模式的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1430-1457. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12713. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
Projected impact of the proposed "bundled" ESRD payment system on a small dialysis organization.拟议的“捆绑式”终末期肾病支付系统对一家小型透析机构的预期影响。
Nephrol News Issues. 2009 Jun;23(7):46, 48-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Payment systems for dialysis and their effects: a scoping review.透析支付系统及其影响:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08974-4.
2
Ferric citrate hydrate is associated with a reduced cost of drugs and a smaller change in red blood cell distribution width.柠檬酸铁铵水合物与降低药物成本和红细胞分布宽度变化较小有关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 14;12(1):2406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06261-0.
3
Medication Burden and Prescribing Patterns in Patients on Hemodialysis in the USA, 2013-2017.美国血液透析患者的药物负担和处方模式,2013-2017 年。
Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(12):919-928. doi: 10.1159/000520028. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
4
Uptake of evidence by physicians: De-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents after the TREAT trial.医生对证据的采纳:TREAT 试验后促红细胞生成素刺激剂的停用。
BMC Nephrol. 2021 Aug 21;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02491-y.
5
Temporal Trends in Hemoglobin, Use of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents, and Major Clinical Outcomes in Incident Dialysis Patients in Canada.加拿大新透析患者血红蛋白、促红细胞生成素刺激剂的使用及主要临床结局的时间趋势
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Jan 5;6(4):1130-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.022. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Artificial intelligence supported anemia control system (AISACS) to prevent anemia in maintenance hemodialysis patients.人工智能支持的贫血控制系统(AISACS)预防维持性血液透析患者贫血。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Feb 22;18(8):1831-1839. doi: 10.7150/ijms.53298. eCollection 2021.
7
Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.医疗保健领域绩效薪酬计划有效性的证据是否正在改变?来自元回归分析的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 24;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06118-8.
8
New Intravenous Calcimimetic Agents: New Options, New Problems. An Example on How Clinical, Economical and Ethical Considerations Affect Choice of Treatment.新型静脉钙敏感受体激动剂:新选择,新问题。一个关于临床、经济和伦理考虑如何影响治疗选择的例子。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4):1238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041238.
9
Working smarter not harder: Coupling implementation to de-implementation.更聪明地工作,而非更努力地工作:将实施与取消实施相结合。
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Jun;6(2):104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
10
ESRD Payment Reform: First Do No Harm.终末期肾病支付改革:首要原则是不造成伤害。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Oct;27(10):2924-2926. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016020153. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare's payment strategy for end-stage renal disease now embraces bundled payment and pay-for-performance to cut costs.医疗保险对终末期肾病的支付策略现在采用捆绑式支付和按绩效付费来降低成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):2051-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0368.
2
The DOPPS Practice Monitor for US dialysis care: trends through April 2011.美国透析护理的DOPPS实践监测:截至2011年4月的趋势
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Feb;59(2):309-12. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
3
Opportunities and challenges for episode-based payment.按诊疗 episode 付费的机遇与挑战。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 1;365(9):777-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1105963. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: an uncontrolled experiment.2011年终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统:一项非对照实验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Apr;57(4):542-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
5
The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: perspectives from DaVita, a for-profit large dialysis organization.2011年终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统:来自达维塔公司(一家营利性大型透析机构)的观点。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Apr;57(4):550-2. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
6
Bundled payment for ESRD--including ESAs in Medicare's dialysis package.终末期肾病的捆绑支付——医疗保险透析套餐中包括促红细胞生成素类似物。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 17;364(7):593-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1014187.
7
Medicare program; end-stage renal disease quality incentive program. Final rule.医疗保险计划;终末期肾病质量激励计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 Jan 5;76(3):627-46.
8
Medicare program; end-stage renal disease prospective payment system. Final rule.医疗保险计划;终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Aug 12;75(155):49029-214.
9
Comparative mortality risk of anemia management practices in incident hemodialysis patients.新诊断血液透析患者贫血管理实践的比较死亡率风险。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):857-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.206.
10
A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.阿法达贝泊汀治疗2型糖尿病和慢性肾病的一项试验。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 19;361(21):2019-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907845. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

医疗保险透析支付改革对促红细胞生成素使用的影响。

Effect of Medicare dialysis payment reform on use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents.

作者信息

Swaminathan Shailender, Mor Vincent, Mehrotra Rajnish, Trivedi Amal N

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI.

Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):790-808. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12252. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12252
PMID:25355431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4450930/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) replaced fee-for-service reimbursement for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) with a fixed-sum bundled payment for all dialysis-related care and pay-for-performance incentives to discourage maintaining patients' hematocrits above 36 percent. We examined the impact of the new payment policy on the use of ESAs.

DATA SOURCES

CMS's Renal Information Management System.

STUDY DESIGN

Regression discontinuity design assessing the use of ESAs by hematocrit level before and after the implementation of the payment policy change.

DATA EXTRACTION

Secondary data from 424,163 patients receiving hemodialysis treatment between January 2009 and June 2011.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The introduction of bundled payments with pay-for-performance initiatives was associated with an immediate and substantial decline in the use of ESAs among patients with hematocrit >36 percent and little change in the use of ESAs among patients with hematocrit ≤36 percent. In the first two quarters of 2011, the use of ESAs during dialysis fell by about 7-9 percentage points among patients with hematocrit levels >36 percent. No statistically significant differences in ESA use were observed at the thresholds of 30 or 33 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

CMS's payment reform for dialysis care reduced the use of ESAs in patients who may not benefit from these agents.

摘要

目的

2011年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)用针对所有透析相关护理的固定金额捆绑支付方式取代了促红细胞生成素(ESA)的按服务收费报销方式,并引入了绩效付费激励措施,以阻止将患者的血细胞比容维持在36%以上。我们研究了这项新支付政策对ESA使用情况的影响。

数据来源

CMS的肾脏信息管理系统。

研究设计

采用回归间断设计,评估支付政策变更实施前后按血细胞比容水平划分的ESA使用情况。

数据提取

2009年1月至2011年6月期间接受血液透析治疗的424,163名患者的二手数据。

主要发现

捆绑支付与绩效付费举措的引入,使得血细胞比容>36%的患者中ESA的使用立即大幅下降,而血细胞比容≤36%的患者中ESA的使用变化不大。在2011年的前两个季度,血细胞比容水平>36%的患者在透析期间ESA的使用下降了约7 - 9个百分点。在30%或33%的阈值处,未观察到ESA使用存在统计学上的显著差异。

结论

CMS对透析护理的支付改革减少了可能无法从这些药物中获益的患者对ESA的使用。