Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine. St. Louis, MO, USA.
Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine. St. Louis, MO, USA
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015 Feb;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou072. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Biliary strictures present a diagnostic challenge, especially when no etiology can be ascertained after laboratory evaluation, abdominal imaging and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sampling. These strictures were traditionally classified as indeterminate strictures, although with advances in endoscopic techniques and better understanding of hepato-biliary pathology, more are being correctly diagnosed. The implications of missing a malignancy in patients with biliary strictures-and hence delaying surgery-are grave but a significant number of patients (up to 20%) undergoing surgery for suspected biliary malignancy can have benign pathology. The diagnostic approach to these patients involves detailed history and physical examination and depends on the presence or absence of jaundice, level of obstruction, and presence or absence of a mass lesion. While abdominal imaging helps to find the level of obstruction and provides a 'road map' for further endoscopic investigations, tissue diagnosis is usually needed to make decisions on management. Initially ERCP was the only modality to investigate these strictures but now, with the development of endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration and the availability of newer techniques such as intraductal ultrasound, single-operator cholangioscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy, the diagnostic approach to biliary strictures has changed significantly. In this review, we will focus on the decision-making process for patients with biliary strictures and discuss the key decision points that should dictate further diagnostic investigations at each step.
胆道狭窄的诊断具有挑战性,尤其是在经过实验室检查、腹部影像学检查和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)取样后仍无法确定病因时。这些狭窄传统上被归类为不确定狭窄,但随着内镜技术的进步和对肝胆病理的更好理解,更多的狭窄得到了正确诊断。在胆道狭窄患者中漏诊恶性肿瘤并因此延迟手术的后果是严重的,但在接受疑似胆道恶性肿瘤手术的患者中,有相当数量(高达 20%)的患者可能存在良性病变。这些患者的诊断方法包括详细的病史和体格检查,取决于是否存在黄疸、梗阻程度以及是否存在肿块。虽然腹部影像学有助于找到梗阻部位,并为进一步的内镜检查提供“路线图”,但通常需要组织学诊断来做出管理决策。最初,ERCP 是唯一用于研究这些狭窄的方法,但现在,随着内镜超声引导下细针抽吸技术的发展以及新型技术(如胆管内超声、单操作胆管镜和共聚焦激光内镜检查)的出现,胆道狭窄的诊断方法发生了重大变化。在这篇综述中,我们将重点关注胆道狭窄患者的决策过程,并讨论在每个步骤中决定进一步诊断检查的关键决策点。