Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;47(6):532-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182745d9f.
In patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary stricture, the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is debated for fear of missing a potentially resectable pancreatobiliary malignancy (PBM). We evaluated the prevalence of (1) PBM; (2) lesions that do not require a potentially curative cancer surgery; and (3) potentially resectable PBMs in patients with false-negative diagnosis by EUS-FNA.
This is a retrospective analysis of 342 patients who underwent EUS/EUS-FNA from 2002 to 2009 after presenting with obstructive jaundice and a biliary stricture. Of these, 170 patients had no definitive mass on computed tomography and 172 patients had definitive mass on computed tomography without evidence of unresectability. Final diagnosis was based on surgical pathology or definitive cytology and clinical follow-up of ≥ 12 months.
The mean age of patients (176 male) was 68.0±12.5 years. A final diagnosis of malignancy was made in only 248 patients (72.5%; 95% confidence interval, 67.7, 77.2). The overall accuracy of EUS-FNA for diagnosing malignancy was 92.4% (89.0, 94.8), with 91.5% sensitivity (87.1, 94.5) and 80.9% negative predictive value (72.0, 87.5). Among 21 patients with false-negative diagnosis, 8 had cholangiocarcinoma (2 resectable), 13 had pancreatic cancer (5 resectable). EUS-FNA provided information to potentially modify surgical management in 116 patients (33.9%; 95% confidence interval, 29.1, 39.0): 89 patients diagnosed as true negatives, 24 with distant malignant lymphadenopathy, and 3 with malignant lymphoma.
In above-defined patient subset, the risk of missing resectable tumors by EUS-FNA has been exaggerated because of artifactually low negative predictive value resulting from a high pretest probability of PBM. The actual miss rate for resectable PBM by EUS-FNA is rather small and was 2% in present cohort. Information from EUS-FNA can potentially modify surgical management in up to one third of patients.
在患有阻塞性黄疸和胆道狭窄的患者中,由于担心漏诊潜在可切除的胰胆管恶性肿瘤(PBM),内镜超声引导下细针抽吸(EUS-FNA)的作用存在争议。我们评估了经 EUS-FNA 诊断为假阴性的患者中(1)PBM 的发生率;(2)不需要潜在根治性癌症手术的病变;以及(3)潜在可切除的 PBM。
这是一项回顾性分析,纳入了 2002 年至 2009 年间因阻塞性黄疸和胆道狭窄就诊并接受 EUS/EUS-FNA 的 342 例患者。其中,170 例患者 CT 无明确肿块,172 例患者 CT 有明确肿块但无不可切除证据。最终诊断基于手术病理或明确的细胞学检查以及≥12 个月的临床随访。
患者的平均年龄(176 例男性)为 68.0±12.5 岁。仅 248 例(72.5%;95%置信区间,67.7,77.2)患者最终诊断为恶性肿瘤。EUS-FNA 诊断恶性肿瘤的总体准确率为 92.4%(89.0,94.8),敏感度为 91.5%(87.1,94.5),阴性预测值为 80.9%(72.0,87.5)。21 例假阴性诊断患者中,8 例为胆管癌(2 例可切除),13 例为胰腺癌(5 例可切除)。EUS-FNA 提供了信息,可能改变了 116 例患者(33.9%;95%置信区间,29.1,39.0)的手术管理:89 例诊断为真阴性,24 例患者远处恶性淋巴结病,3 例患者恶性淋巴瘤。
在上述定义的患者亚组中,EUS-FNA 漏诊可切除肿瘤的风险被夸大了,因为 PBM 的术前概率较高导致假阴性的阴性预测值较低。EUS-FNA 漏诊可切除 PBM 的实际漏诊率很小,在本队列中为 2%。EUS-FNA 的信息可能会改变多达三分之一的患者的手术管理。