Omer Gedikli, Gokhan Aksan, Adem Uzun, Sabri Demircan, Korhan Soylu
Departmant of Cardiology, Artvin State Hospital Artvin, Turkey.
Departmant of Cardiology, Gazi State Hospital Samsun, Turkey.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Sep 15;7(9):3030-6. eCollection 2014.
Current guidelines recommend clinical risk scoring systems for the patients diagnosed and determinated treatment strategy with in Non-ST-elevation elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Previous studies demonstrated association between aortic elasticity properties, stiffness and severity CAD. However, the associations between Aortic stiffness, elasticity properties and clinical risk scores have not been investigated. In the present study we have evaluated the relation between the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score and aortic stiffness in patients with NSTEMI.
We prospectively analyzed 87 consecutive patients with NSTEMI. Aortic elastic parameter and stiffness parameter were calculated from the echocardiographically derived thoracic aortic diameters (mm/m(2)), and the measurement of pulse pressure obtained by cuff sphygmomanometry. We have categorized the patients in to two groups as low ((n = 45) (GRACE risk score ≤ 140)) and high ((n = 42) (GRACE risk score > 140)) risk group according to GRACE risk score and compare the both groups.
Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of patients. Our study showed that Aortic strain was significantly low (3.5 ± 1.4, 7.9 ± 2.3 respectively, p < 0.001) and aortic stiffness index was significantly high (3.9 ± 0.38; 3 ± 0.35, respectively, p < 0.001) in the high risk group values compared to those with low risk group. The aortic stiffness index was the only independent predictor of GRACE risk score (OR: 119.390; 95% CI: 2.925-4872.8; p = 0.011) in multivariate analysis.
We found a significant correlation between aortic stiffness, impaired elasticity and GRACE risk score. Aortic stiffness index was the only independent variable of the high GRACE risk score. The inclusion of aortic stiffness into the GRACE risk score could allow improved risk classification of patients with ACS at admission and this may be important in the diagnosis, follow up and treatment of the patients.
当前指南推荐对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行临床风险评分系统以用于诊断和确定治疗策略。既往研究表明主动脉弹性特性、僵硬度与严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)之间存在关联。然而,主动脉僵硬度、弹性特性与临床风险评分之间的关联尚未得到研究。在本研究中,我们评估了NSTEMI患者的全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)风险评分与主动脉僵硬度之间的关系。
我们前瞻性分析了87例连续的NSTEMI患者。通过超声心动图得出的胸主动脉直径(mm/m²)以及袖带血压计测量的脉压来计算主动脉弹性参数和僵硬度参数。根据GRACE风险评分,我们将患者分为低风险组(n = 45,GRACE风险评分≤140)和高风险组(n = 42,GRACE风险评分>140)两组,并比较两组情况。
表1显示了患者的基线特征。我们的研究表明,与低风险组相比,高风险组的主动脉应变显著降低(分别为3.5±1.4和7.9±2.3,p<0.001),主动脉僵硬度指数显著升高(分别为3.9±0.38;3±0.35,p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,主动脉僵硬度指数是GRACE风险评分的唯一独立预测因素(OR:119.390;95%CI:2.925 - 4872.8;p = 0.011)。
我们发现主动脉僵硬度、弹性受损与GRACE风险评分之间存在显著相关性。主动脉僵硬度指数是高GRACE风险评分的唯一独立变量。将主动脉僵硬度纳入GRACE风险评分可在入院时改善急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的风险分类,这在患者的诊断、随访和治疗中可能很重要。