Signorovitch James E, Betts Keith A, Reichmann William M, Thomason Darren, Galebach Phil, Wu Eric Q, Chen Lei, DeAngelo Daniel J
Analysis Group Inc. , Boston, MA , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Feb;31(2):315-22. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.977992. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
Nilotinib and dasatinib have shown superior rates of molecular response (MR) compared to imatinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). This study indirectly compares MR in patients taking nilotinib 300 mg bid with that in those taking dasatinib 100 mg qd by 12 months and through 48 months.
Patients in ENESTnd were re-weighted to match published baseline characteristics reported for DASISION using a propensity score model. After matching, differences in rates of major MR (MMR, measured as a 3 log reduction on the International Scale [IS]), MR(4.0) (4 log reduction on IS), and MR(4.5) (4.5 log reduction on IS) relative to imatinib were indirectly compared between nilotinib and dasatinib. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to indirectly compare MR outcomes between nilotinib and dasatinib through 48 months of follow-up, while rate differences were used to compare progression to AP/BC between nilotinib and dasatinib by 48 months.
After matching, rates of MR by 12 months were higher with nilotinib vs dasatinib by 11.7% for MMR (p = 0.045), 8.2% for MR(4.0) (p = 0.029), and 8.5% for MR(4.5) (p < 0.001). Higher rates of MMR (HR = 1.44, p = 0.018) and MR(4.0) (HR = 1.58, p = 0.013) achievement were maintained with nilotinib compared to dasatinib through 48 months of follow-up. No statistically significant differences were observed for MR(4.5) through 48 months or progression to AP/BC by 48 months.
LIMITATIONS include comparisons based solely on indirect evidence and HRs for MR(4.0) and MR(4.5) from the DASISION trial being extracted from cumulative incidence curves.
This indirect comparison suggests that nilotinib is associated with higher rates of achieving MMR, MR(4.0), and MR(4.5) by 12 months compared to dasatinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. In addition, higher rates of MR achievement with nilotinib were also maintained through 48 months of follow-up.
与伊马替尼相比,尼罗替尼和达沙替尼在治疗新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病(CML)时显示出更高的分子反应(MR)率。本研究间接比较了服用300mg bid尼罗替尼的患者与服用100mg qd达沙替尼的患者在12个月及48个月时的MR情况。
使用倾向评分模型对ENESTnd研究中的患者进行重新加权,以匹配DASISION研究报告的已发表基线特征。匹配后,间接比较尼罗替尼和达沙替尼相对于伊马替尼的主要MR(MMR,国际量表[IS]上降低3 log)、MR(4.0)(IS上降低4 log)和MR(4.5)(IS上降低4.5 log)率的差异。通过48个月的随访,使用风险比(HR)间接比较尼罗替尼和达沙替尼的MR结果,而使用率差比较尼罗替尼和达沙替尼在48个月时进展为加速期/急变期(AP/BC)的情况。
匹配后,尼罗替尼组12个月时的MR率高于达沙替尼组,MMR高11.7%(p = 0.045),MR(4.0)高8.2%(p = 0.029),MR(4.5)高8.5%(p < 0.001)。在48个月的随访中,尼罗替尼组维持了比达沙替尼组更高的MMR(HR = 1.44,p = 0.018)和MR(4.0)(HR = 1.58,p = 0.013)达成率。在48个月时,未观察到MR(4.5)或48个月时进展为AP/BC的统计学显著差异。
局限性包括仅基于间接证据的比较,以及DASISION试验中MR(4.0)和MR(4.5)的HR是从累积发病率曲线中提取的。
这项间接比较表明,在治疗新诊断的CML-CP时,与达沙替尼相比,尼罗替尼在12个月时实现MMR、MR(4.0)和MR(4.5)的比率更高。此外,在48个月的随访中,尼罗替尼的MR达成率也维持在较高水平。