Soares R, Eden C G
Department of Urology Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK -
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2015 Mar;67(1):33-46. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
High-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) currently comprises 17-35% of newly diagnosed cases and has the highest rate of metastasis and cancer-related death, making its management a top priority for improving prostate cancer outcomes. The definition of HRPC is not consensual and several risk stratification criteria have been used, which hinders the interpretation of data and the comparison of different studies. All classifications include prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage as criteria, but others have been added in an attempt to make stratification more accurate and clinically useful, to enable identification of the patients that can be cured by local treatment of the disease. HRPC was traditionally treated with radiotherapy (RT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but radical prostatectomy (RP) has slowly gained more importance in this context. This article aims to discuss the role of surgery in HRPC, highlighting the advantages of RP as primary treatment option: the ability to provide a definitive stage and grade of the cancer; allowing an early detection of treatment failure by having an undetectable PSA as treatment target; providing excellent local control of the disease; reducing the risk of metastatic progression to a greater extent than does RT. We will try to show the benefits and risks of a "surgery first" approach, keeping in mind that, despite the curative intent, a significant number of patients will still need adjuvant or salvage RT and/or ADT.
高危前列腺癌(HRPC)目前占新诊断病例的17%-35%,其转移率和癌症相关死亡率最高,因此对其进行管理是改善前列腺癌治疗效果的首要任务。HRPC的定义尚未达成共识,并且已经使用了几种风险分层标准,这阻碍了数据的解读以及不同研究之间的比较。所有分类都将前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、活检 Gleason评分和临床分期作为标准,但也增加了其他标准,试图使分层更准确且在临床上更有用,以便能够识别可通过疾病局部治疗治愈的患者。传统上,HRPC采用放疗(RT)和/或雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT),但在这种情况下,根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的重要性已逐渐增加。本文旨在讨论手术在HRPC中的作用,强调RP作为主要治疗选择的优势:能够确定癌症的明确分期和分级;以无法检测到的PSA作为治疗目标,从而能够早期发现治疗失败;对疾病提供出色的局部控制;与放疗相比,在更大程度上降低转移进展的风险。我们将试图展示“手术优先”方法的益处和风险,同时要记住,尽管有治愈的意图,但仍有相当数量的患者仍需要辅助或挽救性放疗和/或ADT。