What you see is what you (don't) get: a comment on Funke's (2014) opinion paper.
作者信息
Greiff Samuel, Martin Romain
机构信息
Education, Culture, Cognition and Society Unit, Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, University of Luxembourg Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 16;5:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01120. eCollection 2014.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What you see is what you (don't) get: a comment on Funke's (2014) opinion paper.
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 16;5:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01120. eCollection 2014.
2
What you don't see can hurt you.
N Y State Dent J. 1993 Mar;59(3):45-7.
3
You get what you get and you don't get upset.
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):123-4. doi: 10.1038/nn0211-123.
4
You don't get what you wish for; you get what you work for!
J Environ Health. 2012 Dec;75(5):54.
5
Cross-national comparisons of complex problem-solving strategies in two microworlds.
Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;34(3):489-520. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01087.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
6
Central tolerance: what you see is what you don't get!
Nat Immunol. 2016 Feb;17(2):115-6. doi: 10.1038/ni.3373.
7
Scrubs: what you don't see is what you get.
CMAJ. 2009 Apr 28;180(9):984. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090150.
8
When Less Is Less: Solving Multiple Simple Problems Is Not Complex Problem Solving-A comment on Greiff et al. (2015).
J Intell. 2017 Jan 5;5(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5010005.
9
You don't always get what you want, and you don't always want what you get: An examination of control-desire for control congruence in transactional relationships.
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1073-88. doi: 10.1037/a0038273. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Now you see it, now you don't: a biochemist's primer for advances in high-resolution microscopy: comment on "Biomolecular dynamics and binding studies in the living cell" by Stephan Diekmann and Christian Hoischen.
Phys Life Rev. 2014 Mar;11(1):36-7; discussion 38. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
引用本文的文献
1
Fluid Ability (Gf) and Complex Problem Solving (CPS).
J Intell. 2017 Jul 13;5(3):28. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5030028.
2
When Less Is Less: Solving Multiple Simple Problems Is Not Complex Problem Solving-A comment on Greiff et al. (2015).
J Intell. 2017 Jan 5;5(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5010005.
3
Sometimes More is Too Much: A Rejoinder to the Commentaries on Greiff et al. (2015).
J Intell. 2017 Jan 5;5(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5010006.
4
Sometimes Less Is Not Enough: A Commentary on Greiff et al. (2015).
J Intell. 2017 Jan 5;5(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5010004.
5
Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153. eCollection 2017.
6
Bringing Formal and Informal Reasoning Together-A New Era of Assessment?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 19;7:1097. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01097. eCollection 2016.
7
Complex problem solving-single ability or complex phenomenon?
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 5;6:1669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01669. eCollection 2015.
8
Is it time for a new measurement approach? A closer look at the assessment of cognitive adaptability in complex problem solving.
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 28;6:1664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01664. eCollection 2015.
本文引用的文献
1
Analysis of minimal complex systems and complex problem solving require different forms of causal cognition.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 16;5:739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00739. eCollection 2014.
2
Investigating naturalistic decision making in a simulated microworld: what questions should we ask?
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Nov;39(4):901-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03192985.
3
The concept of validity.
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):1061-71. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061.
Zotero 插件