Lan Weizhong, Feldkaemper Marita, Schaeffel Frank
Section of Neurobiology of the Eye, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Graduate School of Cellular & Molecular Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Section of Neurobiology of the Eye, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e110906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110906. eCollection 2014.
Bright light has been shown a powerful inhibitor of myopia development in animal models. We studied which temporal patterns of bright light are the most potent in suppressing deprivation myopia in chickens.
Eight-day-old chickens wore diffusers over one eye to induce deprivation myopia. A reference group (n = 8) was kept under office-like illuminance (500 lux) at a 10:14 light:dark cycle. Episodes of bright light (15 000 lux) were super-imposed on this background as follows. Paradigm I: exposure to constant bright light for either 1 hour (n = 5), 2 hours (n = 5), 5 hours (n = 4) or 10 hours (n = 4). Paradigm II: exposure to repeated cycles of bright light with 50% duty cycle and either 60 minutes (n = 7), 30 minutes (n = 8), 15 minutes (n = 6), 7 minutes (n = 7) or 1 minute (n = 7) periods, provided for 10 hours. Refraction and axial length were measured prior to and immediately after the 5-day experiment. Relative changes were analyzed by paired t-tests, and differences among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA.
Compared with the reference group, exposure to continuous bright light for 1 or 2 hours every day had no significant protective effect against deprivation myopia. Inhibition of myopia became significant after 5 hours of bright light exposure but extending the duration to 10 hours did not offer an additional benefit. In comparison, repeated cycles of 1:1 or 7:7 minutes of bright light enhanced the protective effect against myopia and could fully suppress its development.
The protective effect of bright light depends on the exposure duration and, to the intermittent form, the frequency cycle. Compared to the saturation effect of continuous bright light, low frequency cycles of bright light (1:1 min) provided the strongest inhibition effect. However, our quantitative results probably might not be directly translated into humans, but rather need further amendments in clinical studies.
在动物模型中,强光已被证明是近视发展的有力抑制剂。我们研究了哪种强光时间模式在抑制鸡的剥夺性近视方面最有效。
8日龄鸡的一只眼睛佩戴漫射器以诱导剥夺性近视。一个对照组(n = 8)在类似办公室的照度(500勒克斯)下,以10:14的光照:黑暗周期饲养。如下所述,在这个背景下叠加强光(15000勒克斯)照射。模式I:持续暴露于强光1小时(n = 5)、2小时(n = 5)、5小时(n = 4)或10小时(n = 4)。模式II:以50%的占空比重复强光循环,每次循环时间为60分钟(n = 7)、30分钟(n = 8)、15分钟(n = 6)、7分钟(n = 7)或1分钟(n = 7),持续10小时。在为期5天的实验之前和之后立即测量屈光和眼轴长度。通过配对t检验分析相对变化,通过单因素方差分析检验组间差异。
与对照组相比,每天暴露于持续强光1或2小时对剥夺性近视没有显著的保护作用。暴露于强光5小时后近视抑制变得显著,但将持续时间延长至10小时并没有额外的益处。相比之下,1:1或7:7分钟的强光重复循环增强了对近视的保护作用,并能完全抑制其发展。
强光的保护作用取决于暴露持续时间,对于间歇性形式,则取决于频率周期。与持续强光的饱和效应相比,低频强光循环(1:1分钟)提供了最强抑制效果。然而,我们的定量结果可能无法直接应用于人类,而是需要在临床研究中进一步修正。